Cited by 23Music and Audio ProcessingMusic Technology and Sound StudiesRecommender Systems and Techniques

Enriched music representations with multiple cross-modal contrastive learning

Open access
Ferraro, Andres, Favory, Xavier, Drossos, Konstantinos, Kim, Yuntae, Bogdanov, Dmitry·2021·IEEE Signal Processing Letters

Abstract

Modeling various aspects that make a music piece unique is a challenging task, requiring the combination of multiple sources of information. Deep learning is commonly used to obtain representations using various sources of information, such as the audio, interactions between users and songs, or associated genre metadata. Recently, contrastive learning has led to representations that generalize better compared to traditional supervised methods. In this paper, we present a novel approach that combines multiple types of information related to music using cross-modal contrastive learning, allowing us to learn an audio feature from heterogeneous data simultaneously. We align the latent representations obtained from playlists-track interactions, genre metadata, and the tracks' audio, by maximizing the agreement between these modality representations using a contrastive loss. We evaluate our approach in three tasks, namely, genre classification, playlist continuation and automatic tagging. We compare the performances with a baseline audio-based CNN trained to predict these modalities. We also study the importance of including multiple sources of information when training our embedding model. The results suggest that the proposed method outperforms the baseline in all the three downstream tasks and achieves comparable performance to the state-of-the-art.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lsp.2021.3071082

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UniT is a self-supervised framework for cross-modal tasks; it jointly pre-trains different modalities through self-supervised tasks, enabling universal features.

    “UniT [186], on the other hand, is a self-supervised learning framework for cross-modal tasks.It jointly pre-trains different modalities (e.g., vision and text) through self-supervised tasks, enabling the model to learn universal features.”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [186]

    The Abstract (p. 1) describes a cross-modal contrastive approach for learning music-audio features from playlists, genre metadata, and audio. Searches for UniT and for joint self-supervised pre-training of vision and text found no passage addressing the claimed framework or its universal features. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 23

Authors
Ferraro, A., Favory, X., Drossos, K., Kim, Y., & Bogdanov, D.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Kakao Corporation (South Korea) (KR)
Venue
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
Published
2021
Volume
28
Pages
733-737
ISSN
  • 1070-9908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2361
OpenAlex
W3143852976
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Signal Processing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (957337)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
cross-modal contrastive learning, music representation learning, audio embeddings, genre classification, automatic tagging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review