Multi-robot Path Planning Based on Spatio-Temporal Information in Large-scale Unknown Environment
Abstract
Multi-agent path planning is an important re-search direction in robotics due to its wide range of applications such as autonomous driving, automatic storage and so on. Off-the-shelf methods usually only consider the spatial information of the environment where the robot is located. Here we argue that the robot should use both spatial and temporal information to complete action decisions. To this end, We propose a novel multi-robot path planning model mainly composed of three modules: a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) module, a Graph Neural Network (GNN) module and a Long short-term memory (LSTM) module. Specifically, CNN is responsible for extracting the local spatial features of each robot, and the GNN enables multiple robots to communicate their local spatial features with the neighbours. The LSTM completes the task of fusing temporal information. The combination of temporal and spatial information allows the robot to have a memory function when making behavioral decisions. We validated our approach in some complex environments, and the simulation results show that our approach has a better path planning performance than state of the arts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spatial GNN models assume that the underlying structure of the data sources from which the MTS dataset is generated is known.
“Spatial GNN models (e.g., refs.[66][67][68]) are based on the assumption that the underlying structure of the data sources from which the MTS dataset is generated is known.”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baz, M. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12213320 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ding, J., Zhang, L., & Cheng, J.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Venue
- 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-11-26
- Pages
- 795-800
- OpenAlex
- W4205494733
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research and Development
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Shandong University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Keywords
- multi-robot path planning, multi-agent path planning, spatio-temporal information, graph neural networks, convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory, robot communication, unknown environments, large-scale environments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review