Artificial Intelligence and Data Fusion at the Edge
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), owing to recent breakthroughs in deep learning, has revolutionized applications and services in almost all technology domains including aerospace. AI and deep learning rely on huge amounts of training data that are mostly generated at the network edge by Internet of Things (IoT) devices and sensors. Bringing the sensed data from the edge of a distributed network to a centralized cloud is often infeasible because of the massive data volume, limited network bandwidth, and real-time application constraints. Consequently, there is a desire to push AI frontiers to the network edge toward utilizing the enormous amount of data generated by IoT devices near the data source. The merger of edge computing and AI has engendered a new discipline, that is, AI at the edge or edge intelligence. To help AI make sense of gigantic data at the network edge, data fusion is of paramount significance and goes hand in hand with AI. This article focuses on data fusion and AI at the edge. In this article, we propose a framework for data fusion and AI processing at the edge. We then provide a comparative discussion of different data fusion and AI models and architectures. We discuss multiple levels of fusion and different types of AI, and how different types of AI align with different levels of fusion. We then highlight the benefits of combining data fusion with AI at the edge. The methods of AI and data fusion at the edge detailed in this article are applicable to many application domains including aerospace systems. We evaluate the effectiveness of combined data fusion and AI at the edge using convolutional neural network models and multiple hardware platforms suitable for edge computing. Experimental results reveal that combining AI with data fusion can impart a speedup of 9.8× while reducing energy consumption up to 88.5% over AI without data fusion. Furthermore, results demonstrate that data fusion either maintains or improves the accuracy of AI in most cases. For our experiments, data fusion imparts a maximum improvement of 15.8% in accuracy to AI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chaotic-based encryption algorithms are suitable for resource-constrained platforms such as the Internet of Things and edge devices, due to their fast computational speed and minimal complexity.
“Chaotic-based encryption algorithms are suitable for resource-constrained platforms, like the Internet of Things (IoT) and edge devices [62,67], due to their fast computational speed and minimal complexity.”
From Image Encryption Algorithms: A Survey of Design and Evaluation Metrics (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Munir, A., Blasch, E., Kwon, J., Kong, J., & Aved, A.
- Affiliations
- Kansas State University (US)
- United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research (US)
- Kyungpook National University (KR)
- U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Information Directorate (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine
- Published
- 2021-07-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 62-78
- ISSN
- 0885-8985 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-959X
- OpenAlex
- W3178184718
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Air Force Research Laboratory (FA8750-15-3-6003, FA9550-15-0001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- edge AI, data fusion, edge computing, Internet of Things, convolutional neural networks, aerospace systems, energy consumption reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review