Brain-Computer Interfaces: Beyond Medical Applications
Open accessAbstract
Brain-computer interaction has already moved from assistive care to applications such as gaming. Improvements in usability, hardware, signal processing, and system integration should yield applications in other nonmedical areas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 362
- Authors
- van Erp, J., Lotte, F., & Tangermann, M.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 26-34
- ISSN
- 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103275652
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inria.hal.science
- Locations
- Computer (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, gaming, usability, signal processing, system integration, assistive technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review