How open source is changing the software developer's career
Abstract
Software developers with open source project experience acquire verifiable technical expertise, peer-certified competencies, and positional power--advantages that align with companies' need to obtain a competitive advantage.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FLOSS/OSS is an important form of digital infrastructure and technical career pathway for many developers.
“Free/libre open source software (FLOSS/OSS) is an important form of digital infrastructure and technical career pathway for many developers [4,20].”
From Codes of Conduct in Open Source (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Codes of Conduct in Open Source
Frluckaj, H., & Howison, J. (2024) · Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_17 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Riehle, D.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Riehle, Dirk
- ORCID
- Riehle, Dirk
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 51-57
- ISSN
- 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1872049237
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Keywords
- open source software, software developers, career development, technical expertise, positional power, competitive advantage, developer competencies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review