CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Web Application Security VulnerabilitiesSecurity and Verification in ComputingCloud Data Security Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cloud-Native Application Security: Risks, Opportunities, and Challenges in Securing the Evolving Attack Surface

Open access
Chernyshev, Maxim, Baig, Zubair, Zeadally, Sherali·2021·Computer
DOI 10.1109/mc.2021.3076537
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Insecure cloud-native applications (CNAs) will continue to experience security compromises including data breaches due to their dynamic, complex, and varied threat landscape. We review current application security techniques, examine their benefits and shortcomings in the context of CNAs, and point out future research opportunities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mc.2021.3076537

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 2020, Magic quadrant for application security testing
  2. hendrickson, 0, Serverless computation with openlambda, presented at the 8th USENIX Conf Hot Topics Cloud Computing
  3. 10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00026 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/MCC.2016.100 · DOI
  5. monroe, 2018, Securely moving forward with serverless architecture, Proc 13th Annu Symp Information Assurance (ASIA ‘18), 14
  6. 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.073 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2019.8885144 · DOI
  8. felderer, 2016, Chapter 1 - Security testing: A survey, Advances in Computers, 101, 1, 10.1016/bs.adcom.2015.11.003 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/2187671.2187673 · DOI
  10. 2019, The state of open source security – 2019
  11. 2019, OWASP Top 10 2017 The Ten Most Critical Web Application Security Risks
  12. sargent, 2019, Application security needs to shift left
  13. 10.1145/3196398.3196401 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/MS.2016.68 · DOI
  15. 2020, Introduction to Native Cloud Applications
  16. 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.001 · DOI
  17. 2020, 2019 Data Breach Investigations Report
  18. 10.1016/S1353-4858(18)30070-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/VLSI-DAT.2018.8373240 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/SEAMS.2012.6224397 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/IWBIS.2017.8275094 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chernyshev, M., Baig, Z., & Zeadally, S.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
ORCID
Venue
Computer
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2021-11
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
47-57
ISSN
  • 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0814
DOI
10.1109/mc.2021.3076537
OpenAlex
W3210849499
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Computer (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
cloud-native applications, software security, attack surface, data breaches, security techniques, threat landscape, microservices security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review