The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GRS: The green, reliability, and security of emerging machine to machine communications
Abstract
Machine-to-machine communications is characterized by involving a large number of intelligent machines sharing information and making collaborative decisions without direct human intervention. Due to its potential to support a large number of ubiquitous characteristics and achieving better cost efficiency, M2M communications has quickly become a market-changing force for a wide variety of real-time monitoring applications, such as remote e-healthcare, smart homes, environmental monitoring, and industrial automation. However, the flourishing of M2M communications still hinges on fully understanding and managing the existing challenges: energy efficiency (green), reliability, and security (GRS). Without guaranteed GRS, M2M communications cannot be widely accepted as a promising communication paradigm. In this article, we explore the emerging M2M communications in terms of the potential GRS issues, and aim to promote an energy-efficient, reliable, and secure M2M communications environment. Specifically, we first formalize M2M communications architecture to incorporate three domains - the M2M, network, and application domains - and accordingly define GRS requirements in a systematic manner. We then introduce a number of GRS enabling techniques by exploring activity scheduling, redundancy utilization, and cooperative security mechanisms. These techniques hold promise in propelling the development and deployment of M2M communications applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Fog Computing Paradigm: Scenarios and Security Issues
Stojmenovic, I., & Wen, S. (2014) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2014f503 · Cited by 1,037
Mukherjee, A. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2466548 · Cited by 347
Machine-to-Machine Communications: Architectures, Standards and Applications
Chen, M. (2012) · KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems · doi:10.3837/tiis.2012.02.002 · Cited by 314
Greening internet of things for greener and smarter cities: a survey and future prospects
Alsamhi, S. H., Ma, O., Ansari, M. S., & Meng, Q. (2019) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-019-00597-1 · Cited by 124
PADP: Efficient Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation and Dynamic Pricing for Vehicle-to-Grid Networks
Chen, L., Zhou, J., Chen, Y., Cao, Z., Dong, X., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3041117 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, R., Li, X., Liang, X., Shen, X., & Lin, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 28-35
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097422349
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GRS: The green, reliability, and security of emerging machine to machine communications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2011.5741143
- The paper
- Lu, R., Li, X., Liang, X., Shen, X., & Lin, X. (2011). GRS: The green, reliability, and security of emerging machine to machine communications. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2011.5741143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.