The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The global footprint of mobile communications: The ecological and economic perspective
Abstract
This article quantifies the global carbon footprint of mobile communication systems, and discusses its ecological and economic implications. Using up-to-date data and life cycle assessment models, we predict an increase of CO2 equivalent emissions by a factor of three until 2020 compared to 2007, rising from about 86 to 235 Mto CO2e, suggesting a steeper increase than predicted in the well-known SMART2020 report. We provide a breakdown of the global carbon footprint, which reveals that production of mobile devices and global radio access network operation will remain the major contributors, accompanied by an increasing share of emissions due to data transfer in the backbone resulting from rising mobile traffic volumes. The energy bill due to network operation will gain increasing importance in cellular business models. Furthermore, technologies to reduce energy consumption are considered a key enabler for the spread of mobile communications in developing countries. Taking into account several scenarios of technological advancement and rollout, we analyze the overall energy consumption of global radio access networks and illustrate the saving potential of green communication technologies. We conclude that, conditioned on quick implementation and alongside other "classical" improvements of spectral efficiency, these technologies offer the potential to serve three orders of magnitude more traffic with the same overall energy consumption as today.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy and spectral efficiency of very large multiuser MIMO systems
Ngo, H. Q., Larsson, E. G., & Marzetta, T. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2013.020413.110848 · Cited by 3,173
How much energy is needed to run a wireless network?
Auer, G., Giannini, V., Desset, C., Godor, I., Skillermark, P., Olsson, M., Imran, M., Sabella, D., Gonzalez, M., Blume, O., et al. (2011) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2011.6056691 · Cited by 1,539
Self-citationOn Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to 2030
Andrae, A., & Edler, T. (2015) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe6010117 · Cited by 1,334
Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations
Belkhir, L., & Elmeligi, A. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239 · Cited by 970
Energy Efficient Heterogeneous Cellular Networks
Soh, Y. S., Quek, T. Q. S., Kountouris, M., & Shin, H. (2013) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2013.130503 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Fehske, A., Fettweis, G., Malmodin, J., & Biczok, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 55-62
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133019626
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global footprint of mobile communications: The ecological and economic perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2011.5978416
- The paper
- Fehske, A., Fettweis, G., Malmodin, J., & Biczok, G. (2011). The global footprint of mobile communications: The ecological and economic perspective. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2011.5978416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.