The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes
Abstract
The popularity of unmanned aerial vehicles has exploded over the last few years, urgently demanding solutions to transfer large amounts of data from the UAV to the ground. Conversely, a control channel to the UAV is desired, in order to safely operate these vehicles remotely. This article analyzes the use of LTE for realizing this downlink data and uplink control. By means of measurements and simulations, we study the impact of interference and path loss when transmitting data to and from the UAV. Two scenarios are considered in which UAVs act as either base stations transmitting in downlink or UEs transmitting in uplink, and their impact on the respective downlink and uplink performance of an LTE ground network is analyzed. Both measurements and simulations are used to quantify such impact for a range of scenarios with varying altitude, distance from the base station, or UAV density. The measurement sets show that signal-to-interference ratio decreases up to 7 dB for UAVs at 150 m compared to ground users. Simulation results show that a UAV density of 10/km2 gives an average degradation of the signal-to-interference ratio of more than 6 dB. It is concluded that interference is going to be a major limiting factor when LTE enabled UAVs are introduced, and that strong technical solutions will have to be found.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular-Enabled UAV Communication: A Connectivity-Constrained Trajectory Optimization Perspective
Zhang, S., Zeng, Y., & Zhang, R. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2018.2880468 · Cited by 426
A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems
Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Nam, Y.-H., & Debbah, M. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2902862 · Cited by 299
Cognition in UAV-Aided 5G and Beyond Communications: A Survey
Ullah, Z., Al-Turjman, F., & Mostarda, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.2968311 · Cited by 226
Reliable and Efficient Data Collection in UAV-based IoT Networks
Joshi, P., Kalita, A., & Gurusamy, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.05303 · Cited by 61
“Furthermore, LTE propagation planning is predominantly geared toward ground users, resulting in inferior propagation maps for aerial nodes [48].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Der Bergh, B., Chiumento, A., & Pollin, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Magazine
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 44-50
- ISSN
- 0163-6804 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1896
- OpenAlex
- W2398537112
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mcom.2016.7470934
- The paper
- Van Der Bergh, B., Chiumento, A., & Pollin, S. (2016). LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes. IEEE Communications Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2016.7470934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.