Data-Driven Safety Filters: Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability, Control Barrier Functions, and Predictive Methods for Uncertain Systems
Abstract
Today’s control engineering problems exhibit an unprecedented complexity, with examples including the reliable integration of renewable energy sources into power grids[1], safe collaboration between humans and robotic systems[2], and dependable control of medical devices[3]offering personalized treatment[4]. In addition to compliance with safety criteria, the corresponding control objective is often multifaceted. It ranges from relatively simple stabilization tasks to unknown objective functions, which are, for example, accessible only through demonstrations from interactions between robots and humans[5]. Classical control engineering methods are, however, often based on stability criteria with respect to set points and reference trajectories, and they can therefore be challenging to apply in such unstructured tasks with potentially conflicting safety specifications [6, Secs. 3 and 6]. While numerous efforts have started to address these challenges, missing safety certificates often still prohibit the widespread application of innovative designs outside research environments. As described in “Summary,” this article presents safety filters and advanced data-driven enhancements as a flexible framework for overcoming these limitations by ensuring that safety requirements codified as static state constraints are satisfied under all physical limitations of the system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Purely local safety filters may lead to undesirable behavior such as late obstacle avoidance, loss of feasibility, or deadlock situations.
“While effective in ensuring safety, purely local safety filters may lead to undesirable behavior such as late obstacle avoidance, loss of feasibility, or deadlock situations [4, 5].”
From Where to Put Safety? Control Barrier Function Placement in Networked Control Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Where to Put Safety? Control Barrier Function Placement in Networked Control Systems
Beger, S., Chen, Y., & Hirche, S. (2026) · IEEE Control Systems Letters · doi:10.1109/lcsys.2026.3710212
- Authors
- Wabersich, K. P., Taylor, A. J., Choi, J. J., Sreenath, K., Tomlin, C. J., Ames, A. D., & Zeilinger, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Control Systems
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 137-177
- ISSN
- 1066-033X (ISSN-L)
- 1941-000X
- OpenAlex
- W4387123822
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Control Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Keywords
- safety filters, Hamilton-Jacobi reachability, control barrier functions, data-driven control, uncertain systems, safety certificates, safety-critical control, human-robot collaboration, renewable energy integration, medical device control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review