CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Opportunities for Nonvolatile Memory Systems in Extreme-Scale High-Performance Computing

Vetter, Jeffrey S., Mittal, Sparsh·2015·Computing in Science & Engineering
DOI 10.1109/mcse.2015.4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mcse.2015.4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A heterogeneous system can provide high performance for a much wider variety of applications and usage scenarios than using either CPU or GPU alone.

    “Thus, a heterogeneous system can provide high performance for a much wider variety of applications and usage scenarios than using either of CPU or GPU alone [Vetter and Mittal 2015].”

    From A Survey of CPU-GPU Heterogeneous Computing Techniques (2015) · cites this paper as Vetter and Mittal 2015

    The Introduction says heterogeneous computing has increased computational rates in leading supercomputers. Section 2 describes CPU-like and GPU-like cores whose balance depends on workload. Neither passage establishes that a combined system delivers high performance across a much wider variety of applications and usage scenarios than either CPU or GPU alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1145/2485922.2485928 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/2503210.2503215 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/ISPASS.2013.6557176 · DOI
  4. 10.1145/1816038.1815983 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/MSST.2012.6232369 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/HPCA.2011.5749738 · DOI
  7. yoongu, 0, Flipping Bits in Memory without Accessing Them: An Experimental Study of DRAM Disturbance Errors, Proc ACM/IEEE 41st Int’l Symp Computer Architecture, 361
  8. 10.1109/MCG.2009.120 · DOI
  9. jacob, 2010, Memory Systems Cache DRAM Disk
  10. 10.1145/1961296.1950379 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/L-CA.2012.2 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/1555754.1555758 · DOI
  13. choi, 0, 19.2 A 93.4 mm 2 64Gb MLC NAND-Flash Memory with 16nm CMOS Technology, Proc IEEE Int’l Solid-State Circuits Conf Digest of Technical Papers, 328
  14. 10.1145/1555754.1555760 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/1950365.1950380 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/PACT.2013.6618807 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/ISVLSI.2014.69 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/IPDPS.2012.89 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/JSSC.2012.2215094 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/1995896.1995911 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/2228360.2228519 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/1555754.1555761 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/1629575.1629589 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/DSN.2006.5 · DOI
  25. knickerbocker, 0, 2.5 D and 3D Technology Challenges and Test Vehicle Demonstrations, Proc Electronic Components and Technology Conf, 1068
  26. 10.1109/TMAG.2009.2024163 · DOI
  27. vetter, 2013, Contemporary High Performance Computing From Petascale Toward Exascale
  28. 10.1109/TC.2008.177 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/HOTCHIPS.2011.7477494 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/MM.2011.89 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vetter, J. S., & Mittal, S.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Venue
Computing in Science & Engineering
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2015-03
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
73-82
ISSN
  • 1521-9615
  • 1558-366X
DOI
10.1109/mcse.2015.4
Cited by
95
References
0
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review