Cited by 20Stability and Control of Uncertain SystemsNeural Networks Stability and SynchronizationAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Compensation of time-varying input delay for nonlinear systems

Bekiaris-Liberis, Nikolaos, Krstic, Miroslav·2011·2011 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED)

Abstract

We consider general nonlinear systems with time varying input delay for which we design a predictor-based feedback controller. Under the assumptions of forward completeness of the open-loop system and the existence of a (possibly time-varying) stabilizing controller, in the absence of the input delay, our controller achieves global asymptotic stability in the presence of a time-varying input delay. We prove asymptotic stability based on a backstepping transformation which enables us to construct a Lyapunov functional. Our design is illustrated by a numerical example of a second order system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/med.2011.5983098

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The controller incorporates a compensator that effectively cancels the influence of inhomogeneous terms in the PDE actuator state, without imposing restrictions on the severity of the nonlinearity or the feasibility condition, while guaranteeing the latter through an assumption on the positivity of the transport speed to avoid an ill-posed problem.

    “Our controller incorporates a compensator that effectively cancels the influence of inhomogeneous terms in the PDE actuator state, without imposing any restrictions on the severity of the nonlinearity or the feasibility condition [5,6], while guaranteeing the latter through an assumption on the positivity of the transport speed to avoid an illposed problem (see [14,17]).”
  • System (1)-(3) is no longer equivalent to the classical time-delay system in [5,6,14-17].

    “Equation (31) indicates that system (1)-(3) is no longer equivalent to the following classical time-delay system in [5,6,14-17]”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 20

Authors
Bekiaris-Liberis, N., & Krstic, M.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
2011 19th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-06
Pages
1040-1045
ISSN
2325-369X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138521626
Cited by
20
References
38
Citations by year
2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Neural Networks Stability and Synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
time-varying input delay, nonlinear systems, global asymptotic stability, backstepping transformation, Lyapunov functional, forward completeness, time delay compensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review