Cited by 296Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesReliability and Maintenance OptimizationDigital Transformation in Industry

Machine Learning approach for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0

Paolanti, Marina, Romeo, Luca, Felicetti, Andrea, Mancini, Adriano, Frontoni, Emanuele, Loncarski, Jelena·2018·2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA)

Abstract

Condition monitoring together with predictive maintenance of electric motors and other equipment used by the industry avoids severe economic losses resulting from unexpected motor failures and greatly improves the system reliability. This paper describes a Machine Learning architecture for Predictive Maintenance, based on Random Forest approach. The system was tested on a real industry example, by developing the data collection and data system analysis, applying the Machine Learning approach and comparing it to the simulation tool analysis. Data has been collected by various sensors, machine PLCs and communication protocols and made available to Data Analysis Tool on the Azure Cloud architecture. Preliminary results show a proper behavior of the approach on predicting different machine states with high accuracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mesa.2018.8449150

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effectiveness of PdM systems relies heavily on the analytical capabilities provided by various data mining and machine learning techniques.

    “Methodologically, the effectiveness of PdM systems relies heavily on the analytical capabilities provided by various data mining and machine learning techniques.”

    From A Robust Conformal Framework for IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance (2025) · cites this paper as Paolanti et al. (2018)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paolanti, M., Romeo, L., Felicetti, A., Mancini, A., Frontoni, E., & Loncarski, J.
Affiliations
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-07
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2888844977
Cited by
296
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13
FWCI
22.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
  • U-PAD Unimc - Open Digital Publications (University of Macerata) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
predictive maintenance, condition monitoring, electric motors, random forest, machine learning, Industry 4.0, sensor data acquisition, PLC, communication protocols, cloud data analysis, Microsoft Azure, motor failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review