The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Tutorial on Speckle Reduction in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images
Open accessAbstract
Speckle is a granular disturbance, usually modeled as a multiplicative noise, that affects synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images, as well as all coherent images. Over the last three decades, several methods have been proposed for the reduction of speckle, or despeckling, in SAR images. Goal of this paper is making a comprehensive review of despeckling methods since their birth, over thirty years ago, highlighting trends and changing approaches over years. The concept of fully developed speckle is explained. Drawbacks of homomorphic filtering are pointed out. Assets of multiresolution despeckling, as opposite to spatial-domain despeckling, are highlighted. Also advantages of undecimated, or stationary, wavelet transforms over decimated ones are discussed. Bayesian estimators and probability density function (pdf) models in both spatial and multiresolution domains are reviewed. Scale-space varying pdf models, as opposite to scale varying models, are promoted. Promising methods following non-Bayesian approaches, like nonlocal (NL) filtering and total variation (TV) regularization, are reviewed and compared to spatial- and wavelet-domain Bayesian filters. Both established and new trends for assessment of despeckling are presented. A few experiments on simulated data and real COSMO-SkyMed SAR images highlight, on one side the costperformance tradeoff of the different methods, on the other side the effectiveness of solutions purposely designed for SAR heterogeneity and not fully developed speckle. Eventually, upcoming methods based on new concepts of signal processing, like compressive sensing, are foreseen as a new generation of despeckling, after spatial-domain and multiresolution-domain methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation
Mallat, S. G. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.192463 · Cited by 21,372
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion
Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.56205 · Cited by 12,119
De-noising by soft-thresholding
Donoho, D. L. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.382009 · Cited by 9,619
Image denoising by sparse 3-D transform-domain collaborative filtering
Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.901238 · Cited by 9,283
Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets
Daubechies, I. (1988) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.3160410705 · Cited by 8,190
Bilateral Filtering for Gray and Color Images
Tomasi, C., & Manduchi, R. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710815 · Cited by 8,177 · cited 1×
“Bilateral Filtering– The bilateral filter (BF), originally introduced in [105] for gray scale images, has been recently extended to despeckling in [106].”
BackgroundA Non-Local Algorithm for Image Denoising
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J.-M. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.38 · Cited by 7,616
Cited by
Deep Learning Meets SAR: Concepts, models, pitfalls, and perspectives
Zhu, X. X., Montazeri, S., Ali, M., Hua, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, L., Shi, Y., Xu, F., & Bamler, R. (2021) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2020.3046356 · Cited by 357
Psomiadis, E., Diakakis, M., & Soulis, K. X. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12233980 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Argenti, F., Lapini, A., Bianchi, T., & Alparone, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 6-35
- ISSN
- 2168-6831 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2090563002
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 23.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Tutorial on Speckle Reduction in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mgrs.2013.2277512
- The paper
- Argenti, F., Lapini, A., Bianchi, T., & Alparone, L. (2013). A Tutorial on Speckle Reduction in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mgrs.2013.2277512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.