Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine Learning in Pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks

Deng, Liang-jian, Vivone, Gemine, Paoletti, Mercedes E., Scarpa, Giuseppe, He, Jiang, Zhang, Yongjun, Chanussot, Jocelyn, Plaza, Antonio·2022·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is influencing the literature in several research fields, often through state-of-the-art approaches. In the past several years, ML has been explored for pansharpening, i.e., an image fusion technique based on the combination of a multispectral (MS) image, which is characterized by its medium/low spatial resolution, and higher-spatial-resolution panchromatic (PAN) data. Thus, ML for pansharpening represents an emerging research line that deserves further investigation. In this article, we go through some powerful and widely used ML-based approaches for pansharpening that have been recently proposed in the related literature. Eight approaches are extensively compared. Implementations of these eight methods, exploiting a common software platform and ML library, are developed for comparison purposes. The ML framework for pansharpening will be freely distributed to the scientific community. Experimental results using data acquired by five commonly used sensors for pansharpening and well-established protocols for performance assessment (both at reduced resolution and at full resolution) are shown. The ML-based approaches are compared with a benchmark consisting of classical and variational optimization (VO)-based methods. The pros and cons of each pansharpening technique, based on the training-by-examples philosophy, are reported together with a broad computational analysis. The toolbox is provided inhttps://github.com/liangjiandeng/DLPan-Toolbox.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mgrs.2022.3187652

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Metadata

Authors
Deng, L.-J., Vivone, G., Paoletti, M. E., Scarpa, G., He, J., Zhang, Y., Chanussot, J., & Plaza, A.
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
Published
2022-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
279-315
ISSN
  • 2168-6831 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-2397
  • 2373-7468
OpenAlex
W4288391574
Cited by
253
References
102
FWCI
18.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning in Pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mgrs.2022.3187652
The paper
Deng, L.-J., Vivone, G., Paoletti, M. E., Scarpa, G., He, J., Zhang, Y., Chanussot, J., & Plaza, A. (2022). Machine Learning in Pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mgrs.2022.3187652

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.