The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning in Pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is influencing the literature in several research fields, often through state-of-the-art approaches. In the past several years, ML has been explored for pansharpening, i.e., an image fusion technique based on the combination of a multispectral (MS) image, which is characterized by its medium/low spatial resolution, and higher-spatial-resolution panchromatic (PAN) data. Thus, ML for pansharpening represents an emerging research line that deserves further investigation. In this article, we go through some powerful and widely used ML-based approaches for pansharpening that have been recently proposed in the related literature. Eight approaches are extensively compared. Implementations of these eight methods, exploiting a common software platform and ML library, are developed for comparison purposes. The ML framework for pansharpening will be freely distributed to the scientific community. Experimental results using data acquired by five commonly used sensors for pansharpening and well-established protocols for performance assessment (both at reduced resolution and at full resolution) are shown. The ML-based approaches are compared with a benchmark consisting of classical and variational optimization (VO)-based methods. The pros and cons of each pansharpening technique, based on the training-by-examples philosophy, are reported together with a broad computational analysis. The toolbox is provided inhttps://github.com/liangjiandeng/DLPan-Toolbox.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Image Super-Resolution Using Deep Convolutional Networks
Dong, C., Loy, C. C., He, K., & Tang, X. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2439281 · Cited by 10,105
Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networks
Kim, J., Lee, J. K., & Lee, K. M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.182 · Cited by 7,870 · cited 1×
“However, it has proved to be a natural choice for resolution enhancement [120].”
BackgroundThe Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Generative Adversarial Networks
Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.2661 · Cited by 4,477
The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation
Do, M. N., & Vetterli, M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.859376 · Cited by 3,952
The curvelet transform for image denoising
Starck, J.-L., Candes, E. J., & Donoho, D. L. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2002.1014998 · Cited by 2,253
Lucien Wald, A., Ranchin, T., & Mangolini, M. (1997) · HAL · Cited by 1,362
A Critical Comparison Among Pansharpening Algorithms
Vivone, G., Alparone, L., Chanussot, J., Dalla Mura, M., Garzelli, A., Licciardi, G. A., Restaino, R., & Wald, L. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2361734 · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationPixel-level image fusion: A survey of the state of the art
Li, S., Kang, X., Fang, L., Hu, J., & Yin, H. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2016.05.004 · Cited by 1,276
Metadata
- Authors
- Deng, L.-J., Vivone, G., Paoletti, M. E., Scarpa, G., He, J., Zhang, Y., Chanussot, J., & Plaza, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-315
- ISSN
- 2168-6831 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-2397
- 2373-7468
- OpenAlex
- W4288391574
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 18.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine Learning in Pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mgrs.2022.3187652
- The paper
- Deng, L.-J., Vivone, G., Paoletti, M. E., Scarpa, G., He, J., Zhang, Y., Chanussot, J., & Plaza, A. (2022). Machine Learning in Pansharpening: A benchmark, from shallow to deep networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1109/mgrs.2022.3187652
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.