The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Razor: a low-power pipeline based on circuit-level timing speculation
Abstract
With increasing clock frequencies and silicon integration, power aware computing has become a critical concern in the design of embedded processors and systems-on-chip. One of the more effective and widely used methods for power-aware computing is dynamic voltage scaling (DVS). In order to obtain the maximum power savings from DVS, it is essential to scale the supply voltage as low as possible while ensuring correct operation of the processor. The critical voltage is chosen such that under a worst-case scenario of process and environmental variations, the processor always operates correctly. However, this approach leads to a very conservative supply voltage since such a worst-case combination of different variabilities is very rare. In this paper, we propose a new approach to DVS, called Razor, based on dynamic detection and correction of circuit timing errors. The key idea of Razor is to tune the supply voltage by monitoring the error rate during circuit operation, thereby eliminating the need for voltage margins and exploiting the data dependence of circuit delay. A Razor flip-flop is introduced that double-samples pipeline stage values, once with a fast clock and again with a time-borrowing delayed clock. A metastability-tolerant comparator then validates latch values sampled with the fast clock. In the event of timing error, a modified pipeline mispeculation recovery mechanism restores correct program state. A prototype Razor pipeline was designed in a 0.18 /spl mu/m technology and was analyzed. Razor energy overhead during normal operation is limited to 3.1%. Analyses of a full-custom multiplier and a SPICE-level Kogge-Stone adder model reveal that substantial energy savings are possible for these devices (up to 64.2%) with little impact on performance due to error recovery (less than 3%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Borkar, S. (2005) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/mm.2005.110 · Cited by 1,320
A Self-Tuning DVS Processor Using Delay-Error Detection and Correction
Das, S., Roberts, D., Lee, S., Pant, S., Blaauw, D., Austin, T., Flautner, K., & Mudge, T. (2006) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2006.870912 · Cited by 396
Self-citationExploring the Effect of Device Aging on Static Power Analysis Attacks
Karimi, N., Moos, T., & Moradi, A. (2019) · IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems · doi:10.46586/tches.v2019.i3.233-256 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ernst, D., Kim, N. S., Das, S., Pant, S., Rao, R., Pham, T., Ziesler, C., Blaauw, D., Austin, T., Flautner, K., & Mudge, T.
- Venue
- 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.03CH37449)
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Pages
- 7-18
- ISSN
- 1072-4451 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4236432903
- Cited by
- 858
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Razor: a low-power pipeline based on circuit-level timing speculation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/micro.2003.1253179
- The paper
- Ernst, D., Kim, N. S., Das, S., Pant, S., Rao, R., Pham, T., Ziesler, C., Blaauw, D., Austin, T., Flautner, K., & Mudge, T. (2004). Razor: a low-power pipeline based on circuit-level timing speculation. 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.03CH37449). https://doi.org/10.1109/micro.2003.1253179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.