Anomaly Detection with Graph Convolutional Networks for Insider Threat and Fraud Detection
Abstract
Anomaly detection generally involves the extraction of features from entities' or users' properties, and the design of anomaly detection models using machine learning or deep learning algorithms. However, only considering entities' property information could lead to high false positives. We posit the importance of also considering connections or relationships between entities in the detecting of anomalous behaviors and associated threat groups. Therefore, in this paper, we design a GCN (graph convolutional networks) based anomaly detection model to detect anomalous behaviors of users and malicious threat groups. The GCN model could characterize entities' properties and structural information between them into graphs. This allows the GCN based anomaly detection model to detect both anomalous behaviors of individuals and associated anomalous groups. We then evaluate the proposed model using a real-world insider threat data set. The results show that the proposed model outperforms several state-of-art baseline methods (i.e., random forest, logistic regression, SVM, and CNN). Moreover, the proposed model can also be applied to other anomaly detection applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BERT embeddings achieve accuracies above 99% on CERT r6.2 by encoding temporal and semantic features from logs.
“On CERT r6.2, BERT embeddings achieve accuracies above 99% by encoding temporal and semantic features from logs [25,68].”
From A systematic review on insider threat detection using natural language processing (2025) · cites this paper as [68]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Jiang, J., Chen, J., Gu, T., Choo, K.-K. R., Liu, C., Yu, M., Huang, W., & Mohapatra, P.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- Venue
- MILCOM 2019 - 2019 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-11
- Pages
- 109-114
- OpenAlex
- W3011124515
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, graph convolutional networks, insider threat detection, fraud detection, user behavior analysis, graph structure learning, false positive reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review