Cited by 12Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vehicle Detection in UAV Traffic Video Based on Convolution Neural Network

Li, Shulin, Zhang, Weigang, Li, Guorong, Su, Li, Huang, Qingming·2018·2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR)

Abstract

Vehicle detection technology is a key component of an intelligent transportation system, but most of the current vehicle detection technologies are based on road monitoring cameras. Compared with these fixed cameras, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) seem to have a lot of advantages such as more flexible, broader vision, higher speed, which make the vehicle detection more challenging. In this paper, a new dataset built on UAV traffic videos and a neural network which could fuse multi-layer features are proposed. Different from some networks with only a single layer, the proposed network merges the features from multiple layers firstly. Then a convolution layer is used to reduce the feature dimensions and a deconvolution layer is employed to do upsampling and enhance the response information. Finally, multiple fully connected layers are used to finish the detection. Furthermore, the proposed method combines the detecting and tracking for optimization and high detection speed. Experiments on the self-built UAV traffic video dataset demonstrate that the proposed method gets better results and higher speed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mipr.2018.00009

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining different datasets does not guarantee an improvement in vehicle detection performance.

    “Also, combining different datasets does not guarantee an improvement in performance.”
  • [98] suggested that SSD is promising for vehicle detection in aerial imagery and its inherent multi-scale feature structure facilitated multi-size object detection, making it suitable for traffic monitoring at generically high altitudes.

    “In this connection, [98] suggested that the SSD framework is promising for vehicle detection task in aerial imagery and its inherent multi-scale feature structure facilitated multisize object detection, making this solution suitable for traffic monitoring at generically high altitudes.”
  • The Faster R-CNN, R-FCN & SSD with ResNet-50 achieves an F1 score of 86.10% for single class on a custom dataset.

    “[98] | Faster R-CNN, R-FCN & SSD | ResNet-50 | Custom | 3840 × 2160 (25fps) | -- | Top view | i. Single class ii. Multi-class (Ordinary & Heavy vehicles) | -- | i. 86.10 ii. 89.30 | -- | --”
  • The Faster R-CNN, R-FCN & SSD with ResNet-50 achieves an F1 score of 89.30% for multi-class on a custom dataset.

    “[98] | Faster R-CNN, R-FCN & SSD | ResNet-50 | Custom | 3840 × 2160 (25fps) | -- | Top view | i. Single class ii. Multi-class (Ordinary & Heavy vehicles) | -- | i. 86.10 ii. 89.30 | -- | --”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. liu, 2016, SSD: Single Shot Multibox Detector, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 21
  2. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.296 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.164 · DOI
  6. cai, 2016, A Unified Multi-Scale Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Fast Object Detection, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 354
  7. simonyan, 2014, Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, CoRR abs/1409 1556
  8. zeiler, 2014, Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 818
  9. 10.1007/s11263-013-0620-5 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 · DOI · Paper page
  13. dai, 2016, R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-Based Fully Convolutional Networks, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) Barcelona Spain, 379
  14. 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710772 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2345390 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.98 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, S., Zhang, W., Li, G., Su, L., & Huang, Q.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-04
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2811123461
Cited by
12
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
vehicle detection, unmanned aerial vehicles, multi-layer feature fusion, intelligent transportation systems, real-time detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review