The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing SVM and convolutional networks for epileptic seizure prediction from intracranial EEG
Abstract
Recent research suggests that electrophysiological changes develop minutes to hours before the actual clinical onset in focal epileptic seizures. Seizure prediction is a major field of neurological research, enabled by statistical analysis methods applied to features derived from intracranial Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings of brain activity. However, no reliable seizure prediction method is ready for clinical applications. In this study, we use modern machine learning techniques to predict seizures from a number of features proposed in the literature. We concentrate on aggregated features that encode the relationship between pairs of EEG channels, such as cross-correlation, nonlinear interdependence, difference of Lyapunov exponents and wavelet analysis-based synchrony such as phase locking. We compare L1-regularized logistic regression, convolutional networks, and support vector machines. Results are reported on the standard Freiburg EEG dataset which contains data from 21 patients suffering from medically intractable focal epilepsy. For each patient, at least one method predicts 100% of the seizures on average 60 minutes before the onset, with no false alarm. Possible future applications include implantable devices capable of warning the patient of an upcoming seizure as well as implanted drug-delivery devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Self-citationDelorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Cited by
A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling
Längkvist, M., Karlsson, L., & Loutfi, A. (2014) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2014.01.008 · Cited by 1,243
Deep Learning and Its Applications in Biomedicine
Cao, C., Liu, F., Tan, H., Song, D., Shu, W., Li, W., Zhou, Y., Bo, X., & Xie, Z. (2018) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2017.07.003 · Cited by 624
End-to-end learning for music audio
Dieleman, S., & Schrauwen, B. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2014.6854950 · Cited by 364
Focal Onset Seizure Prediction Using Convolutional Networks
Khan, H., Marcuse, L., Fields, M., Swann, K., & Yener, B. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2017.2785401 · Cited by 353
A dynamically configurable coprocessor for convolutional neural networks
Chakradhar, S., Sankaradas, M., Jakkula, V., & Cadambi, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 37th annual international symposium on Computer architecture · doi:10.1145/1815961.1815993 · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirowski, P. W., LeCun, Y., Madhavan, D., & Kuzniecky, R.
- Venue
- 2008 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2008-10
- Pages
- 244-249
- ISSN
- 1551-2541 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084174584
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing SVM and convolutional networks for epileptic seizure prediction from intracranial EEG. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mlsp.2008.4685487
- The paper
- Mirowski, P. W., LeCun, Y., Madhavan, D., & Kuzniecky, R. (2008). Comparing SVM and convolutional networks for epileptic seizure prediction from intracranial EEG. 2008 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/mlsp.2008.4685487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.