Cited by 26Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection

Stability-Based Analysis and Defense against Backdoor Attacks on Edge Computing Services

Zhao, Yi, Xu, Ke, Wang, Haiyang, Li, Bo, Jia, Ruoxi·2021·IEEE Network

Abstract

With the explosive development of mobile Internet and deep learning (DL), intelligent edge computing services based on collaborative learning are widely deployed in various application scenarios. These intelligent services include intelligent applications based on edge computing and DL-based optimization for edge computing (e.g., caching and communicating). However, in a wide variety of domains, DL has been found to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, especially architecture-independent backdoor attacks. It embeds the attack pattern into the learned model and only performs the attack when it encounters the corresponding trigger. In this article, for the first time we analyze the impact of backdoor attacks on intelligent edge computing services. The simulation results demonstrate that once one or more edge nodes implement backdoor attacks, the embedded attack pattern will rapidly expand to all relevant edge nodes, which poses huge challenges to security-sensitive intelligent edge computing services. Subsequently, we analyze the trade-off between expected performance and ability to defend against backdoor attacks, which sheds new light on designing defense mechanisms for intelligent edge computing services. To address the challenges posed by backdoor attacks, we propose a stability-based defense mechanism. The experimental results demonstrate that the newly proposed defense mechanism can effectively defend against different levels of backdoor attacks without knowing whether there are adversaries, which is conducive to the deployment of the stability-based defense mechanism in real-world scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mnet.011.2000265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 26

Authors
Zhao, Y., Xu, K., Wang, H., Li, B., & Jia, R.
Affiliations
  • Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Peng Cheng Laboratory (CN)
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
IEEE Network
Published
2021-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
163-169
ISSN
  • 0890-8044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-156X
OpenAlex
W3188731224
Cited by
26
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Network (publishedVersion)
Funders
China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (61825204)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Keywords
backdoor attacks, edge computing security, adversarial attacks, cooperative learning, deep learning vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review