Cited by 184IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingUAV Applications and OptimizationSatellite Communication Systems

When UAV Swarm Meets Edge-Cloud Computing: The QoS Perspective

Chen, Wuhui, Liu, Baichuan, Huang, Huawei, Guo, Song, Zheng, Zibin·2019·IEEE Network

Abstract

In this article, we propose a hybrid computing model, UAV-Edge-Cloud, bringing edge/cloud computing and UAV swarm together to achieve high quality of service (QoS) guarantees. First, we design this novel hybrid computing framework to provide powerful resources to support resource-intensive applications and real-time tasks at edge networks. Next, we discuss some potential applications for smart cities and raise open research issues of the proposed hybrid framework. We then study a joint task placement and routing problem for latency-critical applications as a case study. Finally, the simulation results show that our approach can improve the QoS of UAV swarms effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mnet.2019.1800222

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced sent data size and distance reduces cost and the significant energy consumption associated with data transfer to the central cloud.

    “This reduced sent data size and distance not only reduces cost but reduces the significant energy consumption associated with the data transfer to the central cloud [45].”
  • Edge AI reduces energy consumption associated with data transfer by enabling preprocessing at the edge, which reduces the amount of data sent to the remote cloud.

    “performing AI processing at the edge reduces energy consumption.This is due to edge AI enabling preprocessing at the edge which results in less data needing to be sent to the remote cloud and, therefore, causing significantly less energy consumption associated with data transfer.”
  • Edge AI reduces operational cost by reducing the amount of data sent, because cloud-side computation cost can be significant when dealing with large volumes of data.

    “edge AI can reduce the cost by reducing the amount of data that needs to sent (by preprocessing at the edge) as there is a cloud side computation cost that can be significant when dealing with large volumes of data [45].”
  • The reduced data size sent to the remote cloud due to edge AI preprocessing helps with operational cost, and this is particularly relevant to formation control.

    “Also, the reduced data size sent to remote cloud due to edge AI's preprocessing helps with regard to operational cost as there is a cloud-side computation cost that can be significant when dealing with large volumes of data [45].This is particularly relevant to formation control.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, W., Liu, B., Huang, H., Guo, S., & Zheng, Z.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
IEEE Network
Published
2019-03
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
36-43
ISSN
  • 0890-8044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-156X
OpenAlex
W2931293404
Cited by
184
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14
FWCI
16.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Network (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › UAV Applications and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
Keywords
UAV swarms, edge-cloud computing, quality of service, task placement, routing, delay-sensitive applications, smart cities, real-time tasks, resource-intensive applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review