The Internet of Space Things/CubeSats
Abstract
The Internet of Things for terrestrial deployments is a major part of next-generation 5G wireless systems. However, there are many use cases such as monitoring of remote areas, Internet provisioning to under-served or disrupted regions, or intelligent global transport management, which require a more global, scalable, flexible, and resilient solution. In this article, the Internet of Space Things, a ubiquitous cyber-physical system for realizing true global connectivity, is introduced. Within this context, this article discusses the state-of-the-art in satellite-based data networks and presents a novel network architecture where Software-defined Networking and Network Function Virtualization serve as key enabling technologies. Further, the major challenges in terms of network design, routing, and resource allocation are also presented. To this end, the Internet of Space Things is the ultimate cyber-physical system, with much broader application and service domains than the traditional Internet of Things.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given the challenges associated with the development and launch of traditional satellites, CubeSats have become a viable alternative for building global satellite networks.
“Given the already mentioned challenges associated with the development and launch of traditional satellites CubeSats have become a viable alternative for building global satellite networks [260, 261].”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [261]
Cites
Cubesats: Cost-effective science and technology platforms for emerging and developing nations
Woellert, K., Ehrenfreund, P., Ricco, A. J., & Hertzfeld, H. (2011) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2010.10.009 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Technologies, Standards and Open Challenges in Satellite IoT
Centenaro, M., Costa, C. E., Granelli, F., Sacchi, C., & Vangelista, L. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3078433 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions
Oche, P. A., Ewa, G. A., & Ibekwe, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3132500 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Given the already mentioned challenges associated with the development and launch of traditional satellites CubeSats have become a viable alternative for building global satellite networks [260, 261].”
- Authors
- Akyildiz, I. F., & Kak, A.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Network
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 212-218
- ISSN
- 0890-8044 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-156X
- OpenAlex
- W2966775234
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Network (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Space Technology and Applications
- Keywords
- CubeSat, software-defined networking, network function virtualization, satellite routing, resource allocation, global connectivity, cyber-physical systems, 5G
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review