The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generative AI in Data Center Networking: Fundamentals, Perspectives, and Case Study
Open accessAbstract
Generative AI (GenAI), exemplified by Large Language Models (LLMs), such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, is revolutionizing various fields. Central to this transformation is Data Center Networking (DCN), which not only provides the infrastructure support for GenAI operation, but also provisions GenAI services to users. Hence, this article explores the interplay between GenAI and DCNs, analyzing their symbiotic relationship and mutual advances. We begin by reviewing the current challenges of DCNs and GenAI-based solutions, such as data augmentation, process automation, and domain transfer. We then discuss the distinctive characteristics of GenAI workloads on DCNs, gaining insights that catalyze the evolution of DCNs to more effectively support GenAI. Moreover, to illustrate the seamless integration of GenAI with DCNs, we present a case study on GenAI-empowered DCN digital twins. Specifically, we employ an LLM equipped with retrieval augmented generation to formulate optimization problems for DCNs (e.g., resource allocation and routing) and adopt diffusion-deep reinforcement learning to solve optimization. The experimental results on a representative DCN optimization problem, i.e., knowledge placement, demonstrate the validity and efficiency of our proposals. We anticipate that this article can promote further research to enhance the virtuous interaction between GenAI and DCNs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The architectural evolution from generative systems to AI Agents marks a shift from content creation to autonomous task execution.
“This architectural evolution marks a critical shift in AI system design: from content creation to autonomous task execution [118], [119].”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [118]
The Introduction describes GenAI as producing digital content, while “DCN Process Automation” describes LLMs automating data-center configuration, procedural compliance, and decision-making. These passages support a move beyond content creation in this setting, but they do not describe an architectural evolution to AI agents or establish autonomous task execution as a general shift in AI system design. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1109/MWC.009.2300165 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNSE.2020.2997376 · DOI
- 10.1145/3600100.3623719 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCC.2019.2940953 · DOI
- Hu, Characterization of large language model development in the datacenter, 709
- 10.1109/COMST.2018.2816042 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2846541 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNSM.2020.3040907 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPDS.2020.3040800 · DOI
- 10.1145/3439602.3439611 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113072 · DOI
- 10.1186/s42400-022-00134-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10489-022-03557-6 · DOI
- 10.1145/3229543.3229549 · DOI
- 10.1145/3651890.3672265 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599 · Cited by 671
“This architectural evolution marks a critical shift in AI system design: from content creation to autonomous task execution [116,117].”
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2025) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v2i3.15161 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Du, H., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Wen, Y., & Kim, D. I.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
- Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
- Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Network
- Published
- 2026-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-174
- ISSN
- 0890-8044 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-156X
- OpenAlex
- W4409659415
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Network (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Keywords
- generative AI, data center networking, large language models, retrieval-augmented generation, digital twin, resource allocation, route optimization, data augmentation, process automation, domain transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review