The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial Neural-Net Based Dynamic Security Assessment for Electric Power Systems
Abstract
In the post-fault dynamic analysis of interconnected power systems, the critical fault clearing time (CCT) is one of the parameters of paramount importance. Critical clearing time is a complex function of pre-fault system conditions (operating point, topology, system parameters), fault structure (type and location) and post-fault conditions that are in part dependent on the protective relaying policy. To define analytically such a relationship would be highly desirable but diversity of variable involved makes this task extremely complicated. Our efforts focus on examination of that complex mapping and investigation of the influence of the various parameters on CCT. The evaluation of CCT involves elaborate computations that often include time-consuming solutions of nonlinear on-fault system equations. Existing conventional pattern recognition techniques are incapable of synthesizing such complex and transparent mappings. Thus, when a human operator tells the machine learning unit (that is the pattern recognizer) that system state belongs to a certain class, say "emergency", the pattern recognizer merely records that classification mindlessly and is not able to look at the pattern with insight and discover what underlies the "emergency" nature of pattern. It is, therefore, highly desirable to have a mechanism which when presented with a sequence of class labeled patterns not only learns an internal structure which allows it to generalize and to classify other and to classify other patterns correctly, but also is able to shed some light on what combination of features give rise to the particular class membership.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
“Neural” computation of decisions in optimization problems
Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. W. (1985) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00339943 · Cited by 6,031
A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine
Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1987) · Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(87)80014-2 · Cited by 2,525
Simulation of self-organizing systems by digital computer
Farley, B., & Clark, W. (1954) · Transactions of the IRE Professional Group on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1954.1057468 · Cited by 270
A connectionist net approach to autonomous machine learning of effective process control strategies
Pao, Y. (1988) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/0736-5845(88)90035-x · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sobajic, D. J., & Pao, Y.-H.
- Venue
- IEEE Power Engineering Review
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 55-55
- ISSN
- 0272-1724 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158053363
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Neural-Net Based Dynamic Security Assessment for Electric Power Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/mper.1989.4310480
- The paper
- Sobajic, D. J., & Pao, Y.-H. (1989). Artificial Neural-Net Based Dynamic Security Assessment for Electric Power Systems. IEEE Power Engineering Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/mper.1989.4310480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.