The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team Creativity in a Hybrid Software Development World: Eight Approaches
Open accessAbstract
Software development is inherently a creative endeavor. With hybrid software development here to stay, this article documents eight approaches we have found that hybrid software teams use to preserve, structure, and promote creativity as part of their day-to-day work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Creativity helps software teams address both everyday and major software tasks.
“Creativity helps teams address the more mundane software tasks that arise everyday as well as the more specialized but typically more infrequent tasks aimed at yielding major product advances.”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [57]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1109/icse-seis52602.2021.00009 · DOI
- Glass, 2006, Software Creativity 2.0
- 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111217 · DOI
- 10.1109/rcis.2013.6577678 · DOI
- 10.1109/tse.2019.2909033 · DOI
- 10.1109/ms.2016.120 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106405 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04643-y · DOI
- 10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00047 · DOI
- 10.1145/3533406.3533411 · DOI
- 10.1145/3372787.3390438 · DOI
- 10.1145/3528579.3529179 · DOI
- 10.1109/icodse53690.2021.9648459 · DOI
- 10.1109/icse43902.2021.00064 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111017 · DOI
- 10.1145/1062455.1062550 · DOI
- 10.1136/qshc.2003.009522 · DOI
- 10.1109/ms.2021.3132137 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda
Jackson, V., Vasilescu, B., Russo, D., Ralph, P., Prikladnicki, R., Izadi, M., D’Angelo, S., Inman, S., Andrade, A., & van der Hoek, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3708523 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, V., Prikladnicki, R., van der Hoek, A., & Marshall, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA
- Salesforce (United States) (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Software
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 60-69
- ISSN
- 0740-7459 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4194
- OpenAlex
- W4312592938
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Software (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CCF-2210812)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Keywords
- team creativity, software development teams, team practice, creativity promotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
