Bike share travel time modeling: San Francisco bay area case study
Abstract
Bike Share Systems (BSSs) are emerging in many US cities as a new sustainable transportation mode that provides a last-mile solution for short-distance transfers between different private and public transportation modes. In order to encourage the increased use of bikes as a mode of transportation, tools, measures, and planning techniques similar to those used for other transportation modes need to be developed. With precise information on the trip travel time, route planner systems can suggest optimal alternative routes, and manage and control traffic congestion. Although there is a growing body of literature dealing with BSSs, bike travel time has been studied sparingly up to this point. In this paper, we addressed this issue by developing different bike travel time models using random forest (RF), least square boosting (LSBoost) and artificial neural network (ANN) techniques. We studied 33 different predictors affecting bike travel time, including such predictors as travel distance, biker experience, time-of-day, and weather conditions. The RF model produced a reasonable prediction rate with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 84.01 sec and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 16.92%. We further improved the bike travel time prediction model by using RF and forward stepwise regression to select the best subset of predictors to explain the bike travel time variability. The resulting model, with only seven predictors, reduced the MAE to 82.04 sec and the MAPE to 16.2%.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By producing accurate travel time estimates, ML can provide tools that help integrate bike shares with other modes.
“By producing accurate travel time estimates, ML can provide tools that help to integrate bike shares with other modes of transportation [281].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [281]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Ghanem, A., Elhenawy, M., Almannaa, M., Ashqar, H. I., & Rakha, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Venue
- 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Pages
- 586-591
- OpenAlex
- W2742772104
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
- Keywords
- bike share systems, travel time modeling, random forest, least squares boosting, artificial neural networks, forward selection, predictor selection, weather conditions, time of day effects, last-mile transportation, San Francisco Bay Area
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review