CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Seeing 21st Century Data Bleed through the 15th Century Wound Man

Stevens, Nikki, Wernimont, Jacqueline·2018·IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
DOI 10.1109/mts.2018.2876214
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Are individuals at risk of "data bleedout" in 21st century environments saturated with wearable devices? Is there a good way of visualizing the range of wearables and related technology so that we can see the impact on both the human and their data? Wearable have been around for a long time ? eyeglasses date to the 13th century and artisans created wearable clocks in the 16th century. The wearable technologies of the 21st century are multiple and plentiful in many commercial markets. CCS Insight has updated its outlook on the future of wearable tech, indicating that 411 million smart wearable devices, worth a staggering $34 billion, will be sold in 2020 [1]. This estimate depends upon a strong growth in the sector; global wearable retail sales in 2017 reached 126 623 units [2]. Much of this growth is expected to come from young adult sectors; according to the Global Web Index, 71 percent of those ages 16 to 24 want "wearable tech," defined as a smart watch, smart wristband, or smart eyewear. Nearly two-thirds of global Internet users have worn a piece of technology already or are eager to do so in the future [3].

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mts.2018.2876214

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. g, 2018, A portfolio of art and research
  2. 0, FDA OKs pill with digital tracking device, CNN
  3. 2017, FDA approves first digital pill, a drug that comes with ingestible sensor, Healthcare IT News
  4. saenz, 2009, Smart toilets: Doctors in your bathroom, Singularity Hub
  5. cameron, 2017, The Internet-of-Things-we-don’t-talk-about, IEEE Pervasive Computing
  6. 2017, The Internet of Us: RADCOMM2017, Katina Michael
  7. lipman, 2014, 71% of 16-to-24-year-olds want ‘wearable tech.’ Why don’t I even want to wear a watch?, Forbes
  8. 2017, Wearable electronics in the U.S. Country report August 2017, Euromonitor
  9. lamkin, 2016, Wearable tech market to be worth $34 billion by 2020, Forbes
  10. wolf, 2009, Know thyself: Tracking every facet of life, from sleep to mood to pain, 24/7/365, Wired
  11. 2016, Starling, Starling by VersaMe
  12. 0, Impulse Bundle | Silver, Bellabeat

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Related

Metadata

Authors
Stevens, N., & Wernimont, J.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
ORCID
Venue
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2018-12
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
46-54
ISSN
  • 0278-0097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-416X
DOI
10.1109/mts.2018.2876214
OpenAlex
W2905042056
Semantic Scholar
28e5cb4df63c67872848c74b46954c8516e1fdad
Cited by
11
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)
Locations
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
wearable devices, data privacy, personal data, smartwatches, smart wristband, smart glasses, data visualization, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review