The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bluetooth: a viable solution for IoT? [Industry Perspectives]
Abstract
The news that Qualcomm is buying the dominant Bluetooth chip vendor, CSR, is creating speculation in the industry that Qualcomm is betting Bluetooth for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. Bluetooth, the technology once pronounced dead by a trade magazine journalist in 2003 [1], has enjoyed popularity and prosperity in the last 10 years for audio communications and stereo streaming. ABI Research predicts that over 3 billion Bluetooth enabled devices will be shipped in 2014, and over 10 billion Bluetooth enabled devices will be on the market by 2018. With the maturity of the technology and its strong presence in the marketplace, the Bluetooth industry is working on expanding the applications of the technology to short-range wireless communication markets other than audio and stereo communications, such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. Currently, it is being used for M2M applications such as credit card readers [2]. For Bluetooth to be suitable for M2M and IoT applications, it needs to reduce power consumption so that it can be used in batterypowered devices for a longer period of time or even the lifetime of the device. To achieve that, the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) introduced Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), which was first specified in Bluetooth 4.0 [3] and further improved in Bluetooth 4.1 [4]. In addition, the Bluetooth stakeholders also expanded work on it, with the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) working on the standardization effort of facilitating Bluetooth in exchanging IP packets.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, wearable device can be hacked by accessing the communication channel between the wearable device and smartphones.128”
From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [128]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 2013, Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.1, The Bluetooth Special Interest Group
- 2010, Bluetooth Core Specification Version 4.0, The Bluetooth Special Interest Group
- galeev, 2011, Bluetooth 4.0: An Introduction to Bluetooth Low Energy-Part I, EETimes
- 10.1109/MCE.2013.2284932 · DOI
- mathias, 2003, Bluetooth Is Dead, EETimes
Cited by
Yetisen, A. K., Martinez‐Hurtado, J. L., Ünal, B., Khademhosseini, A., & Butt, H. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201706910 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, K.-H.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuor-Hsin Chang
- Venue
- IEEE Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 6-7
- ISSN
- 1536-1284 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073230023
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 14.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- Bluetooth, Internet of Things, Bluetooth Low Energy, machine-to-machine communication, Qualcomm, short-range wireless communication, power consumption, Bluetooth 4.0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review