On Removing Routing Protocol from Future Wireless Networks: A Real-time Deep Learning Approach for Intelligent Traffic Control
Abstract
Recently, deep learning has appeared as a breakthrough machine learning technique for various areas in computer science as well as other disciplines. However, the application of deep learning for network traffic control in wireless/heterogeneous networks is a relatively new area. With the evolution of wireless networks, efficient network traffic control such as routing methodology in the wireless backbone network appears as a key challenge. This is because the conventional routing protocols do not learn from their previous experiences regarding network abnormalities such as congestion and so forth. Therefore, an intelligent network traffic control method is essential to avoid this problem. In this article, we address this issue and propose a new, real-time deep learning based intelligent network traffic control method, exploiting deep Convolutional Neural Networks (deep CNNs) with uniquely characterized inputs and outputs to represent the considered Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) backbone. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposal achieves significantly lower average delay and packet loss rate compared to those observed with the existing routing methods. We particularly focus on our proposed method's independence from existing routing protocols, which makes it a potential candidate to remove routing protocol(s) from future wired/ wireless networks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent trend is to optimize wireless communication by AI techniques, including PHY, data link layer, and traffic control.
“a recent new trend is to optimize wireless communication by Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques [4] [5], include but not limited to the application of AI for Physical Layer (PHY), Data Link Layer, and traffic control [6].”
From In-Edge AI: Intelligentizing Mobile Edge Computing, Caching and Communication by Federated Learning (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Tang, F., Mao, B., Fadlullah, Z. M., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- NTT (Japan) (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-160
- ISSN
- 1536-1284 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767151733
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H05858)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
- Keywords
- intelligent traffic control, wireless mesh networks, deep convolutional neural networks, network traffic management, network congestion, packet delay, packet loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review