The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stateful implication logic with memristors
Abstract
In this paper computation with memristors is studied in terms of how many memristors are needed to perform a given logic operation. It has been shown that memristors are naturally suited for performing implication logic (combination of implication and false operation) instead of Boolean logic. Also, it should be noted that a memristor can be used as both a logic gate and a latch (stateful logic). Being functionally complete, implication logic can be used to compute any Boolean function. However, by performing implication logic with stateful devices, storage of intermediate results requires additional memristors to keep data yet to be used from being written over. This paper describes an effective way to compute any Boolean function with a small number of memristors. Also, the length of the corresponding computing sequence is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strukov, D. B., Snider, G. S., Stewart, D. R., & Williams, R. S. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06932 · Cited by 11,828
Memristor—The Missing Circuit Element
Chua, L. (1971) · IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory · doi:10.1109/tct.1971.1083337 · Cited by 10,268 · cited 1×
“It has been shown that memristors are naturally suited for performing implication logic (combination of implication and false operation) instead of Boolean logic.”
Background
Cited by
Kvatinsky, S., Belousov, D., Liman, S., Satat, G., Wald, N., Friedman, E. G., Kolodny, A., & Weiser, U. C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2014.2357292 · Cited by 835
Memory effects in complex materials and nanoscale systems
Pershin, Y. V., & Di Ventra, M. (2011) · Advances In Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2010.544961 · Cited by 823
If it's pinched it's a memristor
Chua, L. (2014) · Semiconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0268-1242/29/10/104001 · Cited by 685
Memristor-Based Material Implication (IMPLY) Logic: Design Principles and Methodologies
Kvatinsky, S., Satat, G., Wald, N., Friedman, E. G., Kolodny, A., & Weiser, U. C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2013.2282132 · Cited by 677
Beyond von Neumann—logic operations in passive crossbar arrays alongside memory operations
Linn, E., Rosezin, R., Tappertzhofen, S., Böttger, U., & Waser, R. (2012) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/23/30/305205 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehtonen, E., & Laiho, M.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-07
- Pages
- 33-36
- OpenAlex
- W2122148191
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stateful implication logic with memristors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/nanoarch.2009.5226356
- The paper
- Lehtonen, E., & Laiho, M. (2009). Stateful implication logic with memristors. 2009 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures. https://doi.org/10.1109/nanoarch.2009.5226356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
