Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FAST: A fog computing assisted distributed analytics system to monitor fall for stroke mitigation

Yu Cao, Songqing Chen, Peng Hou, Brown, Donald·2015·2015 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS)

Abstract

Fog computing is a recently proposed computing paradigm that extends Cloud computing and services to the edge of the network. The new features offered by fog computing (e.g., distributed analytics and edge intelligence), if successfully applied for pervasive health monitoring applications, has great potential to accelerate the discovery of early predictors and novel biomarkers to support smart care decision making in a connected health scenarios. While promising, how to design and develop real-word fog computing-based pervasive health monitoring system is still an open question. As a first step to answer this question, in this paper, we employ pervasive fall detection for stroke mitigation as a case in study. There are four major contributions in this paper: (1) to investigate and develop a set of new fall detection algorithms, including new fall detection algorithms based on acceleration magnitude values and non-linear time series analysis techniques, as well as new filtering techniques to facilitate fall detection process; (2) to design and employ a real-time fall detection system employing fog computing paradigm, which distribute the analytics throughout the network by splitting the detection task between the edge devices (e.g., smartphones attached to the user) and the server (e.g., servers in the cloud); (3) we carefully exam the special needs and constraints of stroke patients and propose patient-centered design that is minimal intrusive to patients. This type of patient-centered design is currently lacking in most of the existing work; and (4) our experiments with real-word data show that our proposed system achieves the high sensitivity (low missing rate) while it also achieves the high specificity (low false alarm rate). At the same time, the response time and energy consumption of our system are close to the minimum of the existing approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/nas.2015.7255196

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Cao, Y., Chen, S., Hou, P., & Brown, D.
Venue
2015 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-08
Pages
2-11
OpenAlex
W1481059522
Cited by
193
References
4
FWCI
9.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FAST: A fog computing assisted distributed analytics system to monitor fall for stroke mitigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/nas.2015.7255196
The paper
Cao, Y., Chen, S., Hou, P., & Brown, D. (2015). FAST: A fog computing assisted distributed analytics system to monitor fall for stroke mitigation. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS). https://doi.org/10.1109/nas.2015.7255196

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.