Classifying the intent of novel users during human locomotion using powered lower limb prostheses
Abstract
Intent recognition systems using pattern recognition technology to control powered lower-limb prostheses are promising for seamlessly changing between locomotion modes- such as transitioning from level walking to stair ascent. These transitions can be accomplished by training an algorithm to recognize the patterns of mechanical and/or myoelectric signals an amputee generates during and between different locomotion modes. While low error rates can be achieved with this method, it typically requires a substantial amount of training data to be gathered. To alleviate this burden, this study investigated training a user-independent classifier from a pool of lower limb amputees performing level walking, ramps and stairs on a powered prosthesis and tested generalization of the classifier to a novel subject. The effect of using the amputee's EMG signals in combination with the mechanical sensors on the leg was also evaluated for this user-independent classifier. Generalization was poor to a novel subject- 48% overall recognition rate with EMG and 62% without (mechanical sensors only). However, an important system improvement could be made by including a few level walking trials of the novel subject (only a few minutes of data collection) in the training data, the overall recognition rate improved to 86% with EMG and 83% without.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of IMU and EMG with LDA achieves 86.0% accuracy with 3% optimization.
“| IMU and EMG | LDA | 86.0% | 3% | 234 |”
From Recent advances in intelligent wearable systems: from multiscale biomechanical features towards human motion intent prediction (2026) · cites this paper as [234]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Young, A. J., Simon, A. M., Fey, N. P., & Hargrove, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
- Venue
- 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-11
- Pages
- 311-314
- ISSN
- 1948-3554 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987979092
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- intent classification, user-independent classification, electromyography, mechanical sensors, stair climbing, amputees, training data reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review