An efficient method for privacy preserving data mining in secure multiparty computation
Abstract
Secure multiparty computation allows multiple parties to participate in a computation. SMC (secure multiparty computation) assumes n parties where n>1. All the parties jointly compute a function. Privacy preserving data mining has become an emerging field in the secure multiparty computation. Privacy preserving data mining preserves the privacy of individual's data. Privacy preserving data mining outputs have the property that the only information learned by the different parties is only the output of the algorithm. In this paper, we discuss an innovative protocol. This protocol uses both actual and idyllic model. By using both the models, we are providing more security and privacy. We break the data blocks into segments and redistribute the segments among all the parties. The key idea is that, whatever computed by a party participating in the protocol, computation based on its input and output only. This is a scenario where it is impossible to know the private data of some other party.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In their proposal, each party breaks its data block into k segments and distributes k-1 segments to other parties.
“In their proposal, each party breaks its data block into k segments and distributes k -1 segments to other parties.”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [119]
Through a series of interchanges between the parties, the total sum of the data is calculated while ensuring the privacy of individual data.
“Through a series of interchanges between the parties, the total sum of the data is calculated while ensuring the privacy of individual data.”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [119]
Pathak et al. extend on this work to propose a secure and privacy-preserving data mining protocol.
“Pathak et al. [119] extend on this work to propose a secure and privacy-preserving data mining protocol.”
From A Survey of Self-Sovereign Identity Ecosystem (2021) · cites this paper as [119]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Pathak, F. A. N., & Pandey, S. B. S.
- Venue
- 2013 Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2013-11
- Pages
- 1-3
- OpenAlex
- W2539281752
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving data mining, secure multi-party computation, privacy-preserving protocols
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review