Exploring Sensor Impact and Architectural Robustness in Adverse Weather on BEV Perception
Open accessAbstract
Reliable perception in automated vehicles under adverse conditions, such as fog, rain, snow, and lens defocus, is essential for maintaining the safety of road actors and particularly of vulnerable road users. While prior work has primarily focused on camera occlusions, the impact on RADAR and LiDAR remains underexplored, particularly in a unified Bird's Eye View (BEV) space. To address this gap, we first apply occlusion to all three primary sensors: camera, RADAR, and LiDAR, and then systematically investigate its impact by projecting their outputs into the Bird's Eye View (BEV) space for unified analysis of vehicle and map segmentation. A parametrised occlusion pipeline is developed to apply occlusions to each of the sensor modalities. We evaluate both geometry-based and transformer-based fusion architectures, revealing that transformer-based architectures consistently demonstrate greater robustness to sensor degradation. Notably, we demonstrate that BEVCar achieves 45.6% vehicle Intersection-over-Union (IoU) and 53.6% Mean Intersection-over-Union (mIoU) under camera occlusion, surpassing other State-of-the-art (SOTA) models such as MMTraP (37.9% IoU / 47.9% mIoU) and CVT (36.0% IoU / 46.6% mIoU). These improvements are statistically significant (paired t-tests with 95% CI bootstrap,$p < 0.001$). Furthermore, projecting camera features into the BEV space using a backward projection strategy seems to offer greater resilience to occlusion than forward projection. These insights highlight the importance of architectural design, projection choice, and multi-sensor fusion in developing robust perception systems for automated driving under realistic multi-sensor occlusions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Uricar et al. introduced the Desoiling Dataset [43] with paired clean and soiled fisheye videos, and applied CycleGAN-based [44] restoration to improve segmentation using ResNet50 [45] and FCN8 [46].”
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The model utilises Vision Mamba (ViM) [60] for image encoding and a deep Q-network (DQN) [61] to learn scene-consistent fusion weights, achieving high detection accuracy under fog and snow on the nuScenes and Radiate datasets [62].”
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648 · see citing works
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To quantify the effect of their perceptual quality on reproducibility, we measured the mean Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) [75] between clean and occluded images (5 k random samples per camera).”
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Uricar et al. introduced the Desoiling Dataset [43] with paired clean and soiled fisheye videos, and applied CycleGAN-based [44] restoration to improve segmentation using ResNet50 [45] and FCN8 [46].”
Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks
Zhu, J.-Y., Park, T., Isola, P., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.244 · Cited by 23,602 · see citing works
The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding
Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., & Schiele, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.350 · Cited by 12,433 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al. investigated the adversarial robustness of real-time semantic segmentation models by proposing [37] a pipeline for generating targeted and untargeted adversarial patch attacks, evaluated on ICNet [38], BiSeNet [39], and DDR-Net [40] across CARLA [41], Cityscapes [42], and real-world data.”
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152 · cited 6× · see citing works
“We simulate occlusion scenarios based on environmental conditions using the nuScenes dataset [23], and evaluate their impact on vehicle and map segmentation tasks in BEV space.”
InfluentialPointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection From Point Clouds
Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Caesar, H., Zhou, L., Yang, J., & Beijbom, O. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01298 · Cited by 4,673 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nawaz et al. proposed a hybrid Red, Green, Blue (RGB), thermal, and LiDAR fusion system [5] using CNNs [54], YOLOv8 [55], and PointPillars [56], achieving robust detection in fog, rain, and nighttime on the FLIR [57], TarDAL [58], and CUHK [59] datasets.”
CARLA: An open urban driving simulator
Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., & Koltun, V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.03938 · Cited by 3,718 · see citing works
BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation
Yu, C., Wang, J., Peng, C., Gao, C., Yu, G., & Sang, N. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_20 · Cited by 2,968 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al. investigated the adversarial robustness of real-time semantic segmentation models by proposing [37] a pipeline for generating targeted and untargeted adversarial patch attacks, evaluated on ICNet [38], BiSeNet [39], and DDR-Net [40] across CARLA [41], Cityscapes [42], and real-world data.”
BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00271 · Cited by 2,641 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Brophy et al. [52] analysed rain’s impact on object detection using BDD100k [53].”
YOLOv8: A Novel Object Detection Algorithm with Enhanced Performance and Robustness
Varghese, R., & M., S. (2024) · 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS) · doi:10.1109/adics58448.2024.10533619 · Cited by 2,007 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nawaz et al. proposed a hybrid Red, Green, Blue (RGB), thermal, and LiDAR fusion system [5] using CNNs [54], YOLOv8 [55], and PointPillars [56], achieving robust detection in fog, rain, and nighttime on the FLIR [57], TarDAL [58], and CUHK [59] datasets.”
ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Images
Zhao, H., Qi, X., Shen, X., Shi, J., & Jia, J. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01219-9_25 · Cited by 1,709 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al. investigated the adversarial robustness of real-time semantic segmentation models by proposing [37] a pipeline for generating targeted and untargeted adversarial patch attacks, evaluated on ICNet [38], BiSeNet [39], and DDR-Net [40] across CARLA [41], Cityscapes [42], and real-world data.”
Liu, J., Fan, X., Huang, Z., Wu, G., Liu, R., Zhong, W., & Luo, Z. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00571 · Cited by 1,336 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nawaz et al. proposed a hybrid Red, Green, Blue (RGB), thermal, and LiDAR fusion system [5] using CNNs [54], YOLOv8 [55], and PointPillars [56], achieving robust detection in fog, rain, and nighttime on the FLIR [57], TarDAL [58], and CUHK [59] datasets.”
Bevfusion: Multi-task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view representation
Liu, Z., Tang, H., Amini, A., Yang, X., Mao, H., Rus, D. L., & Han, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160968 · Cited by 1,307 · cited 6× · see citing works
“We used the official pre-trained checkpoints released by the authors of SimpleBEV [24], BEVFusion [25], and BEVCar [26].”
InfluentialLift, Splat, Shoot: Encoding Images from Arbitrary Camera Rigs by Implicitly Unprojecting to 3D
Philion, J., & Fidler, S. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_12 · Cited by 1,271 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For camera-only BEV segmentation, we compare the fusion architectures with existing baselines such as OFT [84], LSS [27], CVT [29], and MMTRaP [30], reporting vehicle IoU scores ranging from 30.1% to 37.9% under clean sensor conditions.”
InfluentialVision Mamba: Efficient Visual Representation Learning with Bidirectional State Space ModelPreprint
Zhu, L., Liao, B., Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Wang, X. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.09417 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detection
Vora, S., Lang, A. H., Helou, B., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00466 · Cited by 1,236 · see citing works
TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformers
Bai, X., Hu, Z., Zhu, X., Huang, Q., Chen, Y., Fu, H., & Tai, C.-L. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00116 · Cited by 990 · cited 1× · see citing works
“After lifting, the image and RADAR aligned features are fused through a cross-attention mechanism inspired by TransFu-sion [83], where RADAR features serve as queries and camera features as keys and values.”
Deep Dual-Resolution Networks for Real-Time and Accurate Semantic Segmentation of Traffic Scenes
Pan, H., Hong, Y., Sun, W., & Jia, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3228042 · Cited by 856 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…et al. investigated the adversarial robustness of real-time semantic segmentation models by proposing [37] a pipeline for generating targeted and untargeted adversarial patch attacks, evaluated on ICNet [38], BiSeNet [39], and DDR-Net [40] across CARLA [41], Cityscapes [42], and real-world data.”
A comparison between VGG16, VGG19 and ResNet50 architecture frameworks for Image Classification
Mascarenhas, S., & Agarwal, M. (2021) · doi:10.1109/centcon52345.2021.9687944 · Cited by 542 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Teresa et al. developed a deep learning-based weather classification framework [31] using transfer learning with MobileNetV2 [32], DenseNet121 [33], and VGG-16 [34] to classify six weather types on the DAWN2020 [35] and MCWRD2018 [36] datasets.”
MobileNetV2 Model for Image Classification
Dong, K., Zhou, C., Ruan, Y., & Li, Y. (2020) · International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Application (ITCA) · doi:10.1109/itca52113.2020.00106 · Cited by 379 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Teresa et al. developed a deep learning-based weather classification framework [31] using transfer learning with MobileNetV2 [32], DenseNet121 [33], and VGG-16 [34] to classify six weather types on the DAWN2020 [35] and MCWRD2018 [36] datasets.”
Autonomous driving system: A comprehensive survey
Zhao, J., Zhao, W., Deng, B., Wang, Z., Zhang, F., Zheng, W., Cao, W., Nan, J., Lian, Y., & Burke, A. F. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122836 · Cited by 361 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Automated driving technology has made significant advances, enabling vehicles to operate with increasing independence and less oversight in diverse and complex environments [1], [2].”
FUTR3D: A Unified Sensor Fusion Framework for 3D Detection
Chen, X., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhao, H. (2023) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00022 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Cross-view Transformers for real-time Map-view Semantic Segmentation
Zhou, B., & Krähenbühl, P. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01339 · Cited by 317 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Existing studies include both camera-only and multi-sensor models, explored in both image space and BEV representations; however, most do not address the effects of sensor occlusion [28], [29].”
InfluentialWoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Yogamani, S., Hughes, C., Horgan, J., Sistu, G., Chennupati, S., Uricar, M., Milz, S., Simon, M., Amende, K., Witt, C., et al. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00940 · Cited by 303 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Uricar et al. proposed DirtyGAN [51], which introduces synthetic soiling generation to reduce annotation effort and boost detection accuracy, supported by the WoodScape dataset [47].”
Self-citationRADIATE: A Radar Dataset for Automotive Perception in Bad Weather
Sheeny, M., Pellegrin, E. D., Mukherjee, S., Ahrabian, A., Wang, S., & Wallace, A. M. (2021) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9562089 · Cited by 257 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The model utilises Vision Mamba (ViM) [60] for image encoding and a deep Q-network (DQN) [61] to learn scene-consistent fusion weights, achieving high detection accuracy under fog and snow on the nuScenes and Radiate datasets [62].”
LiDAR Snowfall Simulation for Robust 3D Object Detection
Hahner, M., Sakaridis, C., Bijelic, M., Heide, F., Yu, F., Dai, D., & Gool, L. V. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01588 · Cited by 175 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Third, we introduce angular occlusion by removing LiDAR points within a specified angular sector of the point cloud, simulating degradation from obstructions that block certain directions in the field of view [78].”
Multi-Sensor Fusion Technology for 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Review
Wang, X., Li, K., & Chehri, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3317372 · Cited by 168 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By fusing these sensor inputs, automated vehicles aim to achieve reliable perception for object detection [8], tracking [9], segmentation [10], lane marking [11], depth estimation [12], and motion planning by leveraging the relative strengths of each sensing modality [13].”
Simple-BEV: What Really Matters for Multi-Sensor BEV Perception?
Harley, A. W., Fang, Z., Li, J., Ambruş, R., & Fragkiadaki, K. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10160831 · Cited by 159 · cited 6× · see citing works
“We used the official pre-trained checkpoints released by the authors of SimpleBEV [24], BEVFusion [25], and BEVCar [26].”
InfluentialCRN: Camera Radar Net for Accurate, Robust, Efficient 3D Perception
Kim, Y., Shin, J., Kim, S., Lee, I.-J., Choi, J. W., & Kum, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01615 · Cited by 155 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For the camera and RADAR fusion, we compare the fusion architectures against clean-sensor baselines such as MM-TraP [30] and CRN [85], which achieve vehicle IoU scores up to 58.8% and mIoU scores ranging from 53.8% to 70.5%.”
InfluentialDAWNPreprint
Kenk, M. A., & Hassaballah, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.17632/766ygrbt8y.3 · Cited by 154 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Teresa et al. developed a deep learning-based weather classification framework [31] using transfer learning with MobileNetV2 [32], DenseNet121 [33], and VGG-16 [34] to classify six weather types on the DAWN2020 [35] and MCWRD2018 [36] datasets.”
Tahir, N. U. A., Zhang, Z., Asim, M., Chen, J., & ELAffendi, M. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17030103 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
End-to-end deep learning of lane detection and path prediction for real-time autonomous driving
Lee, D., & Liu, J. (2022) · Signal Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-022-02222-2 · Cited by 129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By fusing these sensor inputs, automated vehicles aim to achieve reliable perception for object detection [8], tracking [9], segmentation [10], lane marking [11], depth estimation [12], and motion planning by leveraging the relative strengths of each sensing modality [13].”
Chougule, A., Chamola, V., Sam, A., Yu, F. R., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2023.3335180 · Cited by 129 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Automated driving technology has made significant advances, enabling vehicles to operate with increasing independence and less oversight in diverse and complex environments [1], [2].”
Nesti, F., Rossolini, G., Nair, S., Biondi, A., & Buttazzo, G. (2022) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00288 · Cited by 97 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, Uricar et al. [18] and Yahiaoui et al. [19] explored opaque and transparent soiling detection using image-level annotations, while Nesti et al. [20] investigated adversarial patch attacks for semantic segmentation.”
Kilic, V., Hegde, D., Cooper, A. B., Patel, V. M., & Foster, M. A. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889253 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Physics-based approaches such as LISA [79], Teufel et al. [80], and Yan et al. [77] model light scattering and attenuation under adverse weather (rain, fog, snow) to improve training robustness for detection tasks.”
Exploring Radar Data Representations in Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Review
Yao, S., Guan, R., Peng, Z., Xu, C., Shi, Y., Ding, W., Lim, E. G., Yue, Y., Seo, H., Man, K. L., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3554781 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…weather or low-light conditions, and cannot provide accurate depth information [5]; RADAR is robust in poor visibility but lacks fine spatial detail [6]; and LiDAR delivers accurate 3D spatial information but can be affected by weather conditions, reflec-tive surfaces, or extreme temperatures [7].”
Detection in adverse weather conditions for autonomous vehicles via deep learning
Al-Haija, Q. A., Gharaibeh, M., & Odeh, A. (2022) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai3020019 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Teresa et al. developed a deep learning-based weather classification framework [31] using transfer learning with MobileNetV2 [32], DenseNet121 [33], and VGG-16 [34] to classify six weather types on the DAWN2020 [35] and MCWRD2018 [36] datasets.”
Effects of RF Interference on Radar Receivers
Sanders, F. H., Bedford, B., Sole, R., et al. (2006) · doi:10.70220/0rt3ngtz · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Third, we add Gaussian noise to the RADAR data to reflect increased measurement uncertainty, as commonly observed in cluttered urban environments or under radio-frequency interference [76].”
Driving Environment Uncertainty-Aware Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles
Tang, X., Yang, K., Wang, H., Yu, W., Yang, X., Liu, T., & Li, J. (2022) · Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1186/s10033-022-00790-5 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By fusing these sensor inputs, automated vehicles aim to achieve reliable perception for object detection [8], tracking [9], segmentation [10], lane marking [11], depth estimation [12], and motion planning by leveraging the relative strengths of each sensing modality [13].”
Yang, B., Li, J., & Zeng, T. (2025) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj16010020 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These systems rely on multiple complementary sensors: camera, Radio Detection And Ranging (RADAR), and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), to perceive their surroundings [3], [4].”
Potential risk assessment for safe driving of autonomous vehicles under occluded vision
Wang, D., Fu, W., Song, Q., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08810-z · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This vulnerability poses a critical risk to safety, as occlusions may lead to perception failures and poor decision-making [17].”
BEV-Guided Multi-Modality Fusion for Driving Perception
Man, Y., Gui, L.-Y., & Wang, Y.-X. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02103 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Existing studies include both camera-only and multi-sensor models, explored in both image space and BEV representations; however, most do not address the effects of sensor occlusion [28], [29].”
RoboBEV: Towards Robust Bird's Eye View Perception under Corruptions
Xie, S., Kong, L., Zhang, W., Ren, J., Pan, L., Chen, K., & Liu, Z.-W. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06719 · Cited by 60
Rossolini, G., Nesti, F., D’Amico, G., Nair, S., Biondi, A., & Buttazzo, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3314512 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Rossolini et al. investigated the adversarial robustness of real-time semantic segmentation models by proposing [37] a pipeline for generating targeted and untargeted adversarial patch attacks, evaluated on ICNet [38], BiSeNet [39], and DDR-Net [40] across CARLA [41], Cityscapes [42], and…”
Let’s Get Dirty: GAN Based Data Augmentation for Camera Lens Soiling Detection in Autonomous Driving
Uricar, M., Sistu, G., Rashed, H., Vobecky, A., Kumar, V. R., Krizek, P., Burger, F., & Yogamani, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00081 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Uricar et al. proposed DirtyGAN [51], which introduces synthetic soiling generation to reduce annotation effort and boost detection accuracy, supported by the WoodScape dataset [47].”
Self-citationA Methodology to Model the Rain and Fog Effect on the Performance of Automotive LiDAR Sensors
Haider, A., Pigniczki, M., Koyama, S., et al. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23156891 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other studies focus on contamination of the LiDAR cover, where dust, dirt, or water droplets on the lens can distort or block returns, with approaches developed for fault detection and signal modelling [81], [82].”
Qi, Y., Liu, C., Scaioni, M., Li, Y., Qiao, Y., Ma, X., Wu, H., Zhang, K., & Wang, D. (2024) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104555 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…weather or low-light conditions, and cannot provide accurate depth information [5]; RADAR is robust in poor visibility but lacks fine spatial detail [6]; and LiDAR delivers accurate 3D spatial information but can be affected by weather conditions, reflec-tive surfaces, or extreme temperatures [7].”
Teufel, S., Volk, G., von Bernuth, A., & Bringmann, O. (2022) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/vtc2022-spring54318.2022.9860868 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Physics-based approaches such as LISA [79], Teufel et al. [80], and Yan et al. [77] model light scattering and attenuation under adverse weather (rain, fog, snow) to improve training robustness for detection tasks.”
Benchmarking the Robustness of LiDAR Semantic Segmentation Models
Yan, X., Zheng, C., Xue, Y. W., Li, Z., Cui, S. R., & Dai, D. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-01991-2 · Cited by 34 · cited 2× · see citing works
“First, to mimic adverse weather such as fog and rain, we include random point dropout, a commonly used corruption where scattering and absorption reduce point density and effective sensing range [77].”
Desoiling Dataset: Restoring Soiled Areas on Automotive Fisheye Cameras
Uřičář, M., Uličný, J., Sistu, G., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2019.00526 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Uricar et al. introduced the Desoiling Dataset [43] with paired clean and soiled fisheye videos, and applied CycleGAN-based [44] restoration to improve segmentation using ResNet50 [45] and FCN8 [46].”
Self-citationBEVCar: Camera-Radar Fusion for BEV Map and Object Segmentation
Schramm, J., Vödisch, N., Petek, K., Kiran, B. R., Yogamani, S. K., Burgard, W., & Valada, A. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10802147 · Cited by 33 · cited 6× · see citing works
“We used the official pre-trained checkpoints released by the authors of SimpleBEV [24], BEVFusion [25], and BEVCar [26].”
InfluentialMulti-class Weather Dataset for Image Classification
Ajayi, G. (2018) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.17632/4drtyfjtfy · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Schlager, B., Goelles, T., Muckenhuber, S., & Watzenig, D. (2022) · IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/ojits.2022.3214094 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other studies focus on contamination of the LiDAR cover, where dust, dirt, or water droplets on the lens can distort or block returns, with approaches developed for fault detection and signal modelling [81], [82].”
MapFusion: A novel BEV feature fusion network for multi-modal map construction
Hao, X., Diao, Y., Wei, M., Yang, Y. F., Peng, H., Yin, R., Zhang, H., Li, W., Zhao, S. T., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103018 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“On the mono-sensor side, Zhang et [72], integrating camera and LiDAR features for HD map construction.”
Das, A., Krizek, P., Sistu, G., Burger, F., Madasamy, S., Uricar, M., Kumar, V. R., & Yogamani, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc45102.2020.9294677 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Building on the SoilingNet approach, Das et al. extended this work through TiledSoilingNet [50], which performs tile-level soiling detection and supports embedded multi-task deployment.”
Self-citationSensor Evaluation for Autonomous Surface Vehicles in Inland Waterways
Robinette, P., Sacarny, M. J., DeFilippo, M., et al. (2019) · MTS/IEEE OCEANS Conference (OCEANS) · doi:10.1109/oceanse.2019.8867468 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nawaz et al. proposed a hybrid Red, Green, Blue (RGB), thermal, and LiDAR fusion system [5] using CNNs [54], YOLOv8 [55], and PointPillars [56], achieving robust detection in fog, rain, and nighttime on the FLIR [57], TarDAL [58], and CUHK [59] datasets.”
Chuah, W., Tennakoon, R., Hoseinnezhad, R., & Bab‐Hadiashar, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3060001 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By fusing these sensor inputs, automated vehicles aim to achieve reliable perception for object detection [8], tracking [9], segmentation [10], lane marking [11], depth estimation [12], and motion planning by leveraging the relative strengths of each sensing modality [13].”
Let The Sunshine in: Sun Glare Detection on Automotive Surround-view Cameras
Yahiaoui, L., Uřičář, M., Das, A. K., et al. (2020) · Electronic Imaging · doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2020.16.avm-080 · Cited by 20 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Yahiaoui et al. [19] addressed glare detection under extreme brightness with thresholding and CNN-based methods [49].”
Nawaz, M., Khan, S., Daud, M., et al. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2025.3529495 · Cited by 17 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Nawaz et al. proposed a hybrid Red, Green, Blue (RGB), thermal, and LiDAR fusion system [5] using CNNs [54], YOLOv8 [55], and PointPillars [56], achieving robust detection in fog, rain, and nighttime on the FLIR [57], TarDAL [58], and CUHK [59] datasets.”
Yan, X., Yang, J., Liang, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3505234 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
ORA3D: Overlap Region Aware Multi-view 3D Object Detection
Roh, W., Chang, G., Moon, S., et al. (2022) · British Machine Vision Conference · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.00865 · Cited by 15
Zhang, B., Şimşek, M., Kulhandjian, M., & Kantarcı, B. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13091765 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
MSAFusion: Object Detection Based on Multisensor Adaptive Fusion Under BEV
Wang, M., Wang, H., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2025.3548792 · Cited by 12 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Only a few works, RoboBEV and MSA-Fusion [21], [22] have investigated occlusion effects in the BEV domain.”
Schwarzlmüller, C., Machot, F. A., Fasih, A., et al. (2011) · doi:10.1109/inds.2011.6024782 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Yahiaoui et al. [19] addressed glare detection under extreme brightness with thresholding and CNN-based methods [49].”
Minimizing Occlusion Effect on Multi-view Camera Perception in BEV with Multi-sensor Fusion
Kumar, S., Truong, H., Sharma, S. K., et al. (2025) · Electronic Imaging · doi:10.2352/ei.2025.37.15.avm-113 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition, Kumar et al. investigated [64] the effects of camera occlusion on BEV vehicle segmentation using multi-sensor fusion with SimpleBEV architecture.”
Self-citationAutomotive DNN-Based Object Detection in the Presence of Lens Obstruction and Video Compression
Baris, G., Li, B., Chan, P. H., Avizzano, C. A., & Donzella, V. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3544773 · Cited by 7 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The three severity levels (0.1, 0.2, 0.3) were generated by tuning the opacity parameter in the camera obstruction repository [74].”
InfluentialSelf-citationEnhancing Sensor Perception: Integrating Multi-Sensor Data for Robust Sensor Perception
Gupta, K., Singhal, A., Kumar, A., & Maji, P. (2025) · doi:10.1109/comsnets63942.2025.10885686 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These systems rely on multiple complementary sensors: camera, Radio Detection And Ranging (RADAR), and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), to perceive their surroundings [3], [4].”
MMTraP: Multi-Sensor Multi-Agent Trajectory Prediction in BEV
Sharma, S., Das, A., Sistu, G., Halton, M., & Eising, C. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2025.3574385 · Cited by 6 · cited 5× · see citing works
“As shown in Table 9, baseline methods such as MMTraP [30] and BEVMOSNet [10], evaluated under full sensor availability, achieve strong results with vehicle IoU scores of 63.2% and 61.8%, respectively, and an mIoU score of 64.6% from MMTraP.”
InfluentialSelf-citationSharma, S., Das, A., Sistu, G., Halton, M., & Eising, C. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3459595 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By fusing these sensor inputs, automated vehicles aim to achieve reliable perception for object detection [8], tracking [9], segmentation [10], lane marking [11], depth estimation [12], and motion planning by leveraging the relative strengths of each sensing modality [13].”
Self-citationAnalysis of the Impact of Rain on Perception in Automated Vehicle Applications
Brophy, T., Mullins, D., Parsi, A., Horgan, J., Ward, E., Denny, P., Eising, C., Deegan, B. M., Glavin, M., & Jones, E. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/ojvt.2025.3553718 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Brophy et al. [52] analysed rain’s impact on object detection using BDD100k [53].”
Self-citationBEVMOSNet: Multimodal Fusion for BEV Moving Object Segmentation
Cong, H., Sigatapu, A. K., Das, A. K., et al. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP) · doi:10.5220/0013383300003912 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“By fusing these sensor inputs, automated vehicles aim to achieve reliable perception for object detection [8], tracking [9], segmentation [10], lane marking [11], depth estimation [12], and motion planning by leveraging the relative strengths of each sensing modality [13].”
InfluentialSelf-citationDeep Learning-Based Detection Systems for Autonomous Vehicles in Challenging Weather Conditions
Teresa, M., Induri, S., Kumar, D. V. K. A., Prashanthi, R. R. R. A., Jayasree, D., & Sudhakara, M. (2025) · International Journal of Interpreting Enigma Engineers. · doi:10.62674/ijiee.2025.v2i01.003 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Teresa et al. developed a deep learning-based weather classification framework [31] using transfer learning with MobileNetV2 [32], DenseNet121 [33], and VGG-16 [34] to classify six weather types on the DAWN2020 [35] and MCWRD2018 [36] datasets.”
Chen, W., Liu, Z., Zhao, H., Zhou, S., Li, H., & Liu, Y. (2020) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341317 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nawaz et al. proposed a hybrid Red, Green, Blue (RGB), thermal, and LiDAR fusion system [5] using CNNs [54], YOLOv8 [55], and PointPillars [56], achieving robust detection in fog, rain, and nighttime on the FLIR [57], TarDAL [58], and CUHK [59] datasets.”
Neural Rendering for Sensor Adaptation in 3D Object Detection
Embacher, F., Holtz, D., Uhrig, J., Cordts, M., & Enzweiler, M. (2025) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv64158.2025.11097434 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ui, 2019, SoilingNet: Soiling detection on automotive surround-view cameras, 67
- 10.5555/2969033.2969125 · DOI
- Baek, 2021, Asish Chakrapani Gumparthi Venkat, and Ragunathan Raj Rajkumar. practical object detection using thermal infrared image sensors, 372
- Wang, 2022, DETR3D: 3D object detection from multi-view images via 3D-to-2D queries, 180
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Descriptor: Occluded nuScenes Dataset (OccNuScenes)
Kumar, S., Brophy, T., Mohandas, R., et al. (2026) · IEEE data descriptions. · doi:10.1109/ieeedata.2026.3667122
“The tasks include: 1) vehicle segmentation [21], [19]; 2) map segmentation [19]; and 3) 3-”
InfluentialSelf-citationPFENet: Physics-Informed Frequency-Enhanced YOLO for Object Detection in Hazy Scenes
Bai, K., Zhou, Z., Yang, J., et al. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16104635
Yang, F., Duan, X., Li, F., & Zhang, L. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26113533
“Table 2 summarizes the degradation observed in BEV perception tasks across the three severity levels, as reported by the data team based on the Dirt dataset [31].”
Toward a universal perception layer: A survey on sensor-agnostic advanced driver assistance systems
Bader, T. A., Eberhardt, T. D., Sohn, T. S., & Stork, W. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2026.104543
Yufeng, L., Tian, E., Chen, X., et al. (2026) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones10060470
- Authors
- Kumar, S., Sharma, S., Asghar, R., Mohandas, R., Brophy, T., Sistu, G., Grua, E. M., Donzella, V., & Eising, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Limerick (IE)
- Technological University Dublin (IE)
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 2857-2875
- ISSN
- 2644-1330 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4415221795
- Semantic Scholar
- ade94f2fdeaab6743f08ddd2da4918d29a411f68
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland (13/RC/2094_P2)
- Southern and Eastern Regional Operational Programme to Lero - the Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre for Software
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Keywords
- multi-sensor fusion, sensor occlusion, adverse weather, bird's-eye view, autonomous driving perception, LiDAR, radar, camera occlusion, transformer-based fusion, vehicle segmentation, map segmentation, vulnerable road users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review