Sonification of rotation instructions to support navigation of people with visual impairment.
Abstract
Indoor navigation services for people with visual impairment are being researched in academia, and working systems have already been deployed in public places. While previous research mainly focuses on computing the user's position with high accuracy, providing non-visual navigation instructions is also a challenge and naive approaches can fail in helping users reach their target destination or even expose them to hazards.In this paper we investigate the problem of guiding users to rotate towards a target direction. We propose three different sonification techniques that provide continuous guidance during rotation, and we compare them to a single-impulse baseline, used in previous works. We also explore three variations that reinforce the proposed techniques by combining them with the baseline. A preliminary study with 10 blind participants highlights two dominant techniques, which we analyze through a follow-up study with 18 participants, from 2 groups with very distant cultural backgrounds. While stark differences emerge in the performance from the two groups, we highlight two clear results common to both: 1) one of the proposed techniques significantly outperforms the baseline, reducing the average rotation error by a factor of 3.5 (from 11° to 3°); 2) the interaction speed of this technique, generally slower than the baseline, significantly improves when combined with the baseline technique.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sonification solutions have been considered beneficial in other applications for people with blindness or visual impairment.
“Still, sonification solutions have been considered beneficial in other applications for BVI (29, 57–60).”
From SONOICE! a Sonar–Voice dynamic user interface for assisting individuals with blindness and visual impairment in pinpointing elements in 2D tactile readers (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
These findings underscore the influence of participants' prior experiences and contextual factors in shaping their preference for a particular navigation UI.
“These findings underscore the influence of participants’ prior experiences and contextual factors in shaping their preference for a particular navigation UI, aligning with similar observations in related research (29, 58).”
From SONOICE! a Sonar–Voice dynamic user interface for assisting individuals with blindness and visual impairment in pinpointing elements in 2D tactile readers (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Cites
An experimental system for auditory image representations
Meijer, P. B. L. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.121642 · Cited by 900 · see citing works
Loomis, J. M., Marston, J. R., Golledge, R. G., & Klatzky, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness · doi:10.1177/0145482x0509900404 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Sonification of guidance data during road crossing for people with visual impairments or blindness
Mascetti, S., Picinali, L., Gerino, A., Ahmetovic, D., & Bernareggi, C. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.08.003 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ramôa, G., Schmidt, V., Schwarz, T., Stiefelhagen, R., & König, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1368983 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ahmetovic, D., Avanzini, F., Barate, A., Bernareggi, C., Galimberti, G., Ludovico, L. A., Mascetti, S., & Presti, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Turin (IT)
- University of Milan (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-03
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 2474-249X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963948039
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- sonification, non-visual navigation, visual impairment, blind users, indoor navigation, auditory feedback, rotational error
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review