Cited by 35Tactile and Sensory InteractionsDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Sonification of rotation instructions to support navigation of people with visual impairment.

Ahmetovic, Dragan, Avanzini, Federico, Barate, Adriano, Bernareggi, Cristian, Galimberti, Gabriele, Ludovico, Luca A., Mascetti, Sergio, Presti, Giorgio·2019·2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom

Abstract

Indoor navigation services for people with visual impairment are being researched in academia, and working systems have already been deployed in public places. While previous research mainly focuses on computing the user's position with high accuracy, providing non-visual navigation instructions is also a challenge and naive approaches can fail in helping users reach their target destination or even expose them to hazards.In this paper we investigate the problem of guiding users to rotate towards a target direction. We propose three different sonification techniques that provide continuous guidance during rotation, and we compare them to a single-impulse baseline, used in previous works. We also explore three variations that reinforce the proposed techniques by combining them with the baseline. A preliminary study with 10 blind participants highlights two dominant techniques, which we analyze through a follow-up study with 18 participants, from 2 groups with very distant cultural backgrounds. While stark differences emerge in the performance from the two groups, we highlight two clear results common to both: 1) one of the proposed techniques significantly outperforms the baseline, reducing the average rotation error by a factor of 3.5 (from 11° to 3°); 2) the interaction speed of this technique, generally slower than the baseline, significantly improves when combined with the baseline technique.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/percom.2019.8767407

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmetovic, D., Avanzini, F., Barate, A., Bernareggi, C., Galimberti, G., Ludovico, L. A., Mascetti, S., & Presti, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Venue
2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-03
Pages
1-10
ISSN
2474-249X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963948039
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
sonification, non-visual navigation, visual impairment, blind users, indoor navigation, auditory feedback, rotational error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review