Online State of Charge Estimation Framework using Hybrid Equivalent Circuit Model and Neural Network
Abstract
State of charge (SOC) estimation is a mandatory requirement for almost all battery management systems. A correct and quick estimation of SOC is vital to avoid overcharging and discharging of cells and helps keep the temperature in check. Several approaches have been used to estimate SOC, such as the Open-Circuit Voltage (OCV) look-up method, the Coulomb Counting (CC) method, model-based methods, and data-driven approaches that leverage artificial intelligence. This paper proposes a new approach for online SOC estimation for dynamically discharged Li-ion batteries using a neural network trained on synthetic data generated from a pulse discharge test. The approach requires the user to discharge the Li-ion cell for a few seconds before estimating the SOC. The results with the proposed framework were found to be in good agreement with the benchmark extended Kalman Filter (EKF) approach and converged instantaneously as opposed to the EKF approach, which requires hundreds of iterations for convergence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One hybrid approach uses ECM to capture physical characteristics of the battery and ML (e.g., NN or SVM) to modify the SOC estimate based on the model.
“There is one type of approach, which involves the application of the ECM to capture the physical characteristics of the battery and the subsequent machine learning, for instance, a neural network or SVM to modify the estimate of SOC based on the model [70].”
From Review Paper for SOC Estimation Techniques: Challenges and Future Areas for Improvement (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review Paper for SOC Estimation Techniques: Challenges and Future Areas for Improvement
Rehman, A. (2024) · Power System Technology · doi:10.52783/pst.906 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“There is one type of approach, which involves the application of the ECM to capture the physical characteristics of the battery and the subsequent machine learning, for instance, a neural network or SVM to modify the estimate of SOC based on the model [70].”
MethodZhao, H.-Q., Yin, X., & Hu, J.-H. (2025) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.119468 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In contrast, the second-order RC ECM extends the first-order RC ECM by adding an RC branch, which not only accounts for the nonlinear characteristics of the battery but also provides a more accurate representation of polarization effects during charge–discharge processes [49-51].”
- Authors
- Manzoor, F., Saleem, H., Naqvi, I. H., & Zaffar, N. A.
- Affiliations
- Lahore University of Management Sciences (PK)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-07-16
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 1932-5517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387005877
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Keywords
- state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, artificial neural networks, synthetic data, battery management systems, extended Kalman filter comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review