CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Optimal Power Flow DistributionMicrogrid Control and OptimizationThermal Analysis in Power Transmission

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An investigative study on penetration limits of distributed generation on distribution networks

Ampofo, Desmond Okwabi, Otchere, Isaac Kofi, Frimpong, Emmanuel Asuming·2017·2017 IEEE PES PowerAfrica
DOI 10.1109/powerafrica.2017.7991289
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The rise in penetration levels of distributed generation (DG) poses some challenges to distribution networks. This paper presents the results of an investigation into the effect of high DG penetration levels on thermal limits of distribution lines, and voltage rise at the point of common coupling. The study system used was the 16-bus UK distribution test system. The results obtained indicate voltage rise as the dominant limiting factor for increasing the penetration level of DGs. Also, the maximum penetration limit of DGs was found to depend on its location and the load profile.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/powerafrica.2017.7991289

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. barker, 2000, Determining the Impact of Distributed Generation an Power Systems: Part 1 — Radial Distribution Systems, Proc Power Engineering Society Summer Meefing 2000 IEEE, 3, 1645, 10.1109/PESS.2000.868775 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/PESS.2002.1043465 · DOI
  3. 0, United Kingdom Generic Distribution System (Ukgds)
  4. 10.1109/ICCEP.2013.6586925 · DOI
  5. 0, Matpower
  6. 10.1155/2014/321826 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2077656 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/PESGM.2014.6939292 · DOI
  9. 10.24084/repqj10.368 · DOI
  10. vovos, 2007, Centralized and Distributed Voltage Control: Impact on Distributed Generation Penetration, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22, 476, 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.888982 · DOI
  11. pepermans, 2005, Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues, Energy Policy, 33, 787, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ampofo, D. O., Otchere, I. K., & Frimpong, E. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Energy and Natural Resources (GH)
  • Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
ORCID
Venue
2017 IEEE PES PowerAfrica
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-06
Pages
573-576
DOI
10.1109/powerafrica.2017.7991289
OpenAlex
W2741105925
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE PES PowerAfrica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Keywords
distributed generation, distribution networks, thermal limits, voltage rise, point of common coupling, electricity profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review