The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser
Abstract
This paper has two purposes: 1) to clarify the relationship between the quantum theory of radiation, where the electromagnetic field-expansion coefficients satisfy commutation relations, and the semiclassical theory, where the electromagnetic field is considered as a definite function of time rather than as an operator; and 2) to apply some of the results in a study of amplitude and frequency stability in a molecular beam maser. In 1), it is shown that the semiclassical theory, when extended te take into account both the effect of the field on the molecules and the effect of the molecules on the field, reproduces almost quantitatively the same laws of energy exchange and coherence properties as the quantized field theory, even in the limit of one or a few quanta in the field mode. In particular, the semiclassical theory is shown to lead to a prediction of spontaneous emission, with the same decay rate as given by quantum electrodynamics, described by the Einstein A coefficients. In 2), the semiclassical theory is applied to the molecular beam maser. Equilibrium amplitude and frequency of oscillation are obtained for an arbitrary velocity distribution of focused molecules, generalizing the results obtained previously by Gordon, Zeiger, and Townes for a singel-velocity beam, and by Lamb and Helmer for a Maxwellian beam. A somewhat surprising result is obtained; which is that the measurable properties of the maser, such as starting current, effective molecular Q, etc., depend mostly on the slowest 5 to 10 per cent of the molecules. Next we calculate the effect of amplitude and frequency of oscillation, of small systematic perturbations. We obtain a prediction that stability can be improved by adjusting the system so that the molecules emit all their energy h Ω to the field, then reabsorb part of it, before leaving the cavity. In general, the most stable operation is obtained when the molecules are in the process of absorbing energy from the radiation as they leave the cavity, most unstable when they are still emitting energy at that time. Finally, we consider the response of an oscillating maser to randomly time-varying perturbations. Graphs are given showing predicted response to a small superimposed signal of a frequency near the oscillation frequency. The existence of "noise enhancing" and "noise quieting" modes of operation found here is a general property of any oscillating system in which amplitude is limited by nonlinearity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Self-citationInformation Theory and Statistical Mechanics. II
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.171 · Cited by 3,253
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- slater, 1950, Microwave Electronics
- basov, 1955, On possible methods of producing active molecules for a molecular generator, J Exp Theor Phys (USSR), 28, 249
- 10.1103/PhysRev.82.877 · doi:10.1103/physrev.82.877
- wiener, 1950, Extrapolation Interpolation and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series
- 1958, Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory
- 10.1103/PhysRev.95.282 · doi:10.1103/physrev.95.282
- 10.1103/PhysRev.99.1264 · DOI
- shimoda, 1956, Further aspects of maser theory, Phys Rev, 102, 1308, 10.1103/PhysRev.102.1308 · doi:10.1103/physrev.102.1308
- 10.1109/JRPROC.1958.286977 · doi:10.1109/jrproc.1958.286977
- 10.1063/1.1722709 · doi:10.1063/1.1722709
- 10.1103/PhysRev.93.99 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.1722572 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRev.106.8 · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.8
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.4.87 · DOI · Paper page
- basov, 1954, Applications of molecular beams to radio spectroscopic studies of rotation spectra of molecules, J Exp Theor Phys (USSR), 27, 431
Cited by
Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system
Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P. A., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1 · Cited by 5,109
Entanglement in many-body systems
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., & Vedral, V. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.517 · Cited by 3,745
Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions
Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.281 · Cited by 2,739
Graphene Plasmonics: A Platform for Strong Light–Matter Interactions
Koppens, F. H. L., Chang, D. E., & García de Abajo, F. J. (2011) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl201771h · Cited by 2,702
Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity
Raimond, J. M., Brune, M., & Haroche, S. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.565 · Cited by 2,686
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaynes, E. T., & Cummings, F. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1963
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-109
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963811960
- Cited by
- 5,353
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.