Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 291

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing of a large aperture seismic array

Capon, J., Greenfield, R.J., Kolker, R.J.·1967·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

The experimental Large Aperture Seismic Array (LASA) represents an attempt to improve the capability to monitor underground nuclear weapons tests and small earthquakes by making a large extrapolation in the existing art of building arrays of spaced and interconnected seismic transducers. The LASA is roughly equivalent to 21 separate subarrays, each consisting of 25 sensors, spread over an aperture of 200 km. The present work considers the problem of designing a linear filter which combines the outputs of the 25 sensors in a subarray so as to suppress the noise without distorting the signal, or event. This filter provides a minimum-variance unbiased estimate of the signal which is the same as the maximum-likelihood estimate of the signal if the noise is a multidimensional Gaussian process. An extensive discussion of the theory of multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing is given. A computer program implementation of the maximum-likelihood filter is presented which employs the cross-correlation matrix of noise measured just prior to the arrival of the event. This time-domain synthesis procedure requires relatively large amounts of computer time to synthesize the filter, and is quite sensitive to the assumption of noise stationarity. The asymptotic theory of maximum-likelihood filtering is also given. An asymptotically optimum frequency-domain synthesis technique is given for two-sided multidimensional filters. This procedure is well suited to machine computation and has the advantage with respect to the time-domain procedure of requiring about 10 times less computation time. A description of a computer program implementation of the frequency-domain synthesis method is given which employs the spectral matrix of the noise estimated just before the arrival of the event. The experimental results obtained by processing several events recorded at the LASA are presented, as well as a comparison of the performance of the frequency-domain method relative to the time-domain synthesis technique. It is found that the signal-to-noise improvement given by the frequency-domain procedure is within 2 dB of the gain obtained with the time-domain procedure, and that the frequency-domain method is relatively insensitive to the assumption of noise stationarity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/proc.1967.5439

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 291

Metadata

Authors
Capon, J., Greenfield, R. J., & Kolker, R. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
1967
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
192-211
ISSN
0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006081134
Cited by
291
References
1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing of a large aperture seismic array. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1967.5439
The paper
Capon, J., Greenfield, R. J., & Kolker, R. J. (1967). Multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing of a large aperture seismic array. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1967.5439

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.