The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing of a large aperture seismic array
Abstract
The experimental Large Aperture Seismic Array (LASA) represents an attempt to improve the capability to monitor underground nuclear weapons tests and small earthquakes by making a large extrapolation in the existing art of building arrays of spaced and interconnected seismic transducers. The LASA is roughly equivalent to 21 separate subarrays, each consisting of 25 sensors, spread over an aperture of 200 km. The present work considers the problem of designing a linear filter which combines the outputs of the 25 sensors in a subarray so as to suppress the noise without distorting the signal, or event. This filter provides a minimum-variance unbiased estimate of the signal which is the same as the maximum-likelihood estimate of the signal if the noise is a multidimensional Gaussian process. An extensive discussion of the theory of multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing is given. A computer program implementation of the maximum-likelihood filter is presented which employs the cross-correlation matrix of noise measured just prior to the arrival of the event. This time-domain synthesis procedure requires relatively large amounts of computer time to synthesize the filter, and is quite sensitive to the assumption of noise stationarity. The asymptotic theory of maximum-likelihood filtering is also given. An asymptotically optimum frequency-domain synthesis technique is given for two-sided multidimensional filters. This procedure is well suited to machine computation and has the advantage with respect to the time-domain procedure of requiring about 10 times less computation time. A description of a computer program implementation of the frequency-domain synthesis method is given which employs the spectral matrix of the noise estimated just before the arrival of the event. The experimental results obtained by processing several events recorded at the LASA are presented, as well as a comparison of the performance of the frequency-domain method relative to the time-domain synthesis technique. It is found that the signal-to-noise improvement given by the frequency-domain procedure is within 2 dB of the gain obtained with the time-domain procedure, and that the frequency-domain method is relatively insensitive to the assumption of noise stationarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series
Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · Cited by 13,154
Cited by
Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications
Widrow, B., Glover, J. R., McCool, J. M., Kaunitz, J., Williams, C. S., Hearn, R. H., Zeidler, J. R., Eugene Dong, Jr., & Goodlin, R. C. (1975) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1975.10036 · Cited by 3,939
Widrow, B., Mantey, P. E., Griffiths, L. J., & Goode, B. B. (1967) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1967.6092 · Cited by 1,051
Metadata
- Authors
- Capon, J., Greenfield, R. J., & Kolker, R. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1967
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-211
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006081134
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing of a large aperture seismic array. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1967.5439
- The paper
- Capon, J., Greenfield, R. J., & Kolker, R. J. (1967). Multidimensional maximum-likelihood processing of a large aperture seismic array. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1967.5439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.