The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of load-flow calculation methods
Abstract
A survey is presented on the currently available numerical techniques for power-system load-flow calculation using the digital computer. The review deals with methods that have received widespread practical application, recent attractive developments, and other methods that have interesting or useful characteristics. The analytical bases, computational requirements, and comparative numerical performances of the methods are discussed. Attention is given to the problems and techniques of adjustments in load-flow solutions, and the suitabilities of various methods for modern applications such as security monitoring and optimal load flow are examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stott, B., Jardim, J., & Alsac, O. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2021235 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationNew method for the analysis of distribution networks
Cespedes, R. G. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/61.107303 · Cited by 355
AlHajri, M. F., & El-Hawary, M. E. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2021039 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Stott, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1974
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 916-929
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118171222
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of load-flow calculation methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1974.9544
- The paper
- Stott, B. (1974). Review of load-flow calculation methods. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1974.9544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
