The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface
Abstract
A compact dyadic diffraction coefficient for electromagnetic waves obliquely incident on a curved edse formed by perfectly conducting curved ot plane surfaces is obtained. This diffraction coefficient remains valid in the transition regions adjacent to shadow and reflection boundaries, where the diffraction coefficients of Keller's original theory fail. Our method is based on Keller's method of the canonical problem, which in this case is the perfectly conducting wedge illuminated by plane, cylindrical, conical, and spherical waves. When the proper ray-fixed coordinate system is introduced, the dyadic diffraction coefficient for the wedge is found to be the sum of only two dyads, and it is shown that this is also true for the dyadic diffraction coefficients of higher order edges. One dyad contains the acoustic soft diffraction coefficient; the other dyad contains the acoustic hard diffraction coefficient. The expressions for the acoustic wedge diffraction coefficients contain Fresenel integrals, which ensure that the total field is continuous at shadow and reflection boundaries. The diffraction coefficients have the same form for the different types of edge illumination; only the arguments of the Fresnel integrals are different. Since diffraction is a local phenomenon, and locally the curved edge structure is wedge shaped, this result is readily extended to the curved wedge. It is interesting that even though the polarizations and the wavefront curvatures of the incident, reflected, and diffracted waves are markedly different, the total field calculated from this high-frequency solution for the curved wedge is continuous at shadow and reflection boundaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Site-specific propagation prediction for wireless in-building personal communication system design
Seidel, S. Y., & Rappaport, T. S. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/25.330150 · Cited by 549
Han, C., Bicen, A. O., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2014.2386335 · Cited by 489
Enhancement of Light Extraction from Light Emitting Diodes
Zhmakin, A. I. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.001 · Cited by 312
NeRF2: Neural Radio-Frequency Radiance Fields
Zhao, X., An, Z., Pan, Q., & Yang, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking · doi:10.1145/3570361.3592527 · Cited by 131
NVIDIA AI Aerial: AI-Native Wireless Communications
Cohen-Arazi, K., Roe, M., Hu, Z., Chavan, R., Ptasznik, A., Lin, J., Morais, J., Boccuzzi, J., & Balercia, T. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.01533 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kouyoumjian, R. G., & Pathak, P. H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1974
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1448-1461
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018543755
- Cited by
- 2,627
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1974.9651
- The paper
- Kouyoumjian, R. G., & Pathak, P. H. (1974). A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1974.9651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.