The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive quantization of picture signals using spatial masking
Abstract
Visual sensitivity of human observers decreases at and adjacent to large luminance changes: a fact well known to psychophysicists but not yet fully utilized for picture coding. In this paper we present a systematic investigation of these changes in visual sensitivity and apply it to adapt the quantizer of a predictive coder. The paper consists of three parts. In the first part, earlier psychophysical work in related areas relevant to picture coding is briefly reviewed. Certain simple measures of luminance activity (called the masking functions) are constructed. Subjective experiments which obtain fidelity measures related to the masking functions, using complex scenes (real-life pictures, head and shoulders view), are described. These relationships, called the visibility functions, express relationship between the relative amplitude accuracy required by the viewer and the masking functions. Perceptual, statistical, and contextual properties are inherent in them. Relationship between the visibility functions and some earlier measurements of psychovisual weighting functions are pointed out. In the second part, several adaptation strategies for the quantizer of a predictive DPCM coder are discussed. These include uniform as well as nonuniform quantizers with or without entropy constraints. These strategies are simulated on a computer, and the results are presented in the third part. The simulations indicate that, for the same picture quality, by using adaptive strategies, entropy reductions of about 30-50 percent are possible over nonadaptive techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images
Mannos, J., & Sakrison, D. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1974.1055250 · Cited by 1,063
Cited by
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Transform coefficient histogram-based image enhancement algorithms using contrast entropy
Agaian, S. S., Silver, B., & Panetta, K. A. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.888338 · Cited by 575
The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code
BURT, P. J., & ADELSON, E. H. (1987) · Readings in Computer Vision · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-051581-6.50065-9 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Netravali, A. N., & Prasada, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1977
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 536-548
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099590965
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive quantization of picture signals using spatial masking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1977.10515
- The paper
- Netravali, A. N., & Prasada, B. (1977). Adaptive quantization of picture signals using spatial masking. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1977.10515
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.