The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constrained iterative restoration algorithms
Abstract
This paper describes a rather broad class of iterative signal restoration techniques which can be applied to remove the effects of many different types of distortions. These techniques also allow for the incorporation of prior knowledge of the signal in terms of the specification of a constraint operator. Conditions for convergence of the iteration under various combinations of distortions and constraints are explored. Particular attention is given to the use of iterative restoration techniques for constrained deconvolution, when the distortion band-limits the signal and spectral extrapolation must be performed. It is shown that by predistorting the signal (and later removing this predistortion) it is possible to achieve spectral extrapolation, to broaden the class of signals for which these algorithms achieve convergence, and to improve their performance in the presence of broad-band noise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uncertainty Principles and Signal Recovery
Donoho, D. L., & Stark, P. B. (1989) · SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0149053 · Cited by 1,054
Applications of Digital Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics
(2002) · The International Series in Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.1007/b117882 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Schafer, R. W., Mersereau, R. M., & Richards, M. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 1981
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 432-450
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013378881
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constrained iterative restoration algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1981.11987
- The paper
- Schafer, R. W., Mersereau, R. M., & Richards, M. A. (1981). Constrained iterative restoration algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1981.11987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.