Cited by 11Optimal Power Flow DistributionMicrogrid Control and OptimizationPower System Optimization and Stability

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Fast Quasi-Static Time Series Simulation Method for PV Smart Inverters with VAR Control using Linear Sensitivity Model

Open access
Qureshi, Muhammad Umer, Grijalva, Santiago, Reno, Matthew J.·2018·2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)

Abstract

Fast deployment of renewable energy resources in distribution networks, especially solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, have motivated the need for inverter-based voltage regulation. Integration studies are often necessary to fully understand the potential impacts of PV inverter settings on the various elements of the distribution system, including voltage regulators and capacitor banks. A year long quasi-static time series (QSTS) at second-level granularity provides a comprehensive assessment of these impacts, however the computational burden associated with running QSTS limits its applicability. This paper proposes a fast QSTS simulation technique capable of modeling the smart inverter dynamic VAR control functionality and accurately estimating the states of controllable elements including voltage regulators and capacitor banks at each time step. Consequently, the complex interactions between various legacy voltage regulation devices is also captured. The efficacy of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated on the IEEE 13-bus test case with a 98% reduction in computation time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/pvsc.2018.8547439

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Refs [82,83] presented a fast scalable quasi-static time series (QSTS) simulation algorithm using a linear sensitivity model to perform time series analysis on a 3-phase unbalanced, non-radial distribution network with different discrete step control elements.

    “For example, Refs.[82,83] presented a fast scalable quasi-static time series (QSTS) simulation algorithm using a linear sensitivity model to perform time series analysis on a 3-phase unbalanced, non-radial distribution network with different discrete step control elements.”

    From Methods and Tools for PV and EV Hosting Capacity Determination in Low Voltage Distribution Networks—A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Conclusion (p. 6) describes this paper’s fast, linear-sensitivity QSTS algorithm for three-phase unbalanced systems with discrete-step controls. The Introduction (p. 1) attributes the ability to analyze meshed (non-radial) networks specifically to earlier work [18]; our copy does not explicitly establish that capability for this paper’s extended algorithm. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These fast QSTS studies show more than a 99% reduction in computation time compared to the traditional time series method.

    “The results of these studies show more than a 99% reduction in computation time compared to the traditional time series method.”

    From Methods and Tools for PV and EV Hosting Capacity Determination in Low Voltage Distribution Networks—A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Simulation Results (p. 5) report a computation-time reduction of more than 98% relative to brute-force QSTS, and the Conclusion (p. 6) describes the method as more than 90 times faster. Neither establishes the claimed reduction of more than 99%. The Introduction (p. 1) assigns that figure to previous work, not to this paper’s smart-inverter results. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.2172/1259558 · DOI
  2. reno, 2017, Motivation and Requirements for Quasi-Static Time Series (QSTS) for Distribution System Analysis, IEEE PES General Meeting
  3. 10.2172/1367462 · DOI
  4. deboever, 2017, Scalability of Vector Quantization Approach for Fast QSTS Simulation, 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366149 · DOI
  5. deboever, 2018, Fast quasi-static time-series (QSTS) for yearlong PV impact studies using vector quantization, Solar Energy, 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/ISGT.2017.8086045 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2726502 · DOI
  8. zhang, 2017, A Fast Quasi-Static Time Series (QSTS) Simulation Method for PV Impact Studies using Voltage Sensitivities of Controllable Elements, 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366414 · DOI
  9. qureshi, 2018, A Fast Scalable Quasi-Static Time Series Analysis Method for PV Impact Studies using Linear Sensitivity Model, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
  10. christakou, 2013, Efficient Computation of Sensitivity Coefficients of Node Voltages and Line Currents in Unbalanced Radial Electrical Distribution Networks, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4, 741, 10.1109/TSG.2012.2221751 · DOI
  11. 2013, Advanced inverter technologies report
  12. 10.2172/1235905 · DOI
  13. 2018, Electric Tariff Rule 21
  14. troester, 2009, New German grid codes for connecting PV systems to the medium voltage power grid, 2nd International Workshop on Concentrating Photovoltaic Power Plants Opt Design Prod Grid Connection
  15. 10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107407 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772598 · DOI
  17. 2017, U S Solar Market Insight
  18. 10.1109/NAPS.2015.7335080 · DOI
  19. bernstein, 2017, Load-Flow in Multiphase Distribution Networks: Existence, Uniqueness, and Linear Models, ArXiv e-prints
  20. tamp, 2014, A sensitivity analysis toolkit for the simplification of mv distribution network voltage management, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10.1109/TSG.2014.2300146 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Qureshi, M. U., Grijalva, S., & Reno, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Volume
4
Pages
1614-1619
OpenAlex
W2902942692
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
Keywords
quasi-static time-series simulation, voltage regulator, capacitor bank, distribution networks, photovoltaic integration, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review