Cited by 13Optimal Power Flow DistributionThermal Analysis in Power TransmissionElectric Power System Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Practical Data-Driven Methods to Improve the Accuracy and Detail of Hosting Capacity Analysis

Deboever, Jeremiah, Grijalva, Santiago, Peppanen, Jouni, Rylander, Matthew, Smith, Jeff·2018·2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)

Abstract

Distributed energy resource (DER) hosting capacity of distribution feeders is commonly analyzed with scenario-based methods assuming specific load conditions. For feeders with existing DER, additional processing is necessary to capture conditions of these DERs, that can impact hosting capacity indicators. Only modeling min/max scenarios for the load and DER may not represent realistic worst-case scenarios and may lead to under- or over-estimating the hosting capacity. This paper proposes a method based on historical data that determines a set of scenarios which captures worst-case conditions and enables accurate determination of hosting capacity values. This paper also proposes a probabilistic hosting capacity analysis method that provides valuable information for robust system planner decisions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/pvsc.2018.8547693

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 2010, Distribution Test Feeders, IEEE org
  2. bolognani, 2015, On the Existence and Linear Approximation of the Power Flow Solution in Power Distribution Networks, IEEE Trans Power Syst, pp
  3. kersting, 2012, Distribution System Modeling and Analysis
  4. peppanen, 2017, Assessing Energy Storage Accommodation Limits to Aid in Distribution Planning and Operation, IEEE PES General Meeting, 1
  5. 2017, Distribution Resource Integration and Value Estimation (DRIVE), CEDR Knoxville TN
  6. newlander, 2016, Distribution Reources Plan - Demonstration A - Enhanced Integration Capacity Analysis, San Diego CA
  7. qureshi, 0, A Fast Scalable Quasi-Static Time Series Analysis Method for PV Impact Studies using Linear Sensitivity Model, IEEE Trans Sustain Energy (Early Access), 1
  8. smith, 2016, Defining a Roadmap for Successful Implementation of a Hosting Capacity Method for New York State, Palo Alto CA EPRI Report ID 3002008848

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Deboever, J., Grijalva, S., Peppanen, J., Rylander, M., & Smith, J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Electric Power Research Institute (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
3676-3681
OpenAlex
W2902087321
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
hosting capacity, distributed energy resources, distribution feeders, scenario-based assessment, worst-case scenario, historical data, power system planning, loading conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review