Cited by 72Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

Transferability of optimal QAOA parameters between random graphs

Open access
Galda, Alexey, Liu, Xiaoyuan, Lykov, Danylo, Alexeev, Yuri, Safro, Ilya·2021·2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)

Abstract

The Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is one of the most promising candidates for achieving quantum advantage through quantum-enhanced combinatorial optimization. In a typical QAOA setup, a set of quantum circuit parameters is optimized to prepare a quantum state used to find the optimal solution of a combinatorial optimization problem. Several empirical observations about optimal parameter concentration effects for special QAOA MaxCut problem instances have been made in recent literature, however, a rigorous study of the subject is still lacking. We show that convergence of the optimal QAOA parameters around specific values and, consequently, successful transferability of parameters between different QAOA instances can be explained and predicted based on the local properties of the graphs, specifically the types of subgraphs (lightcones) from which the graphs are composed. We apply this approach to random regular and general random graphs. For example, we demonstrate how optimized parameters calculated for a 6-node random graph can be successfully used without modification as nearly optimal parameters for a 64-node random graph, with less than 1% reduction in approximation ratio as a result. This work presents a pathway to identifying classes of combinatorial optimization instances for which such variational quantum algorithms as QAOA can be substantially accelerated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/qce52317.2021.00034

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classes of problems exhibit pronounced parameter concentration of optimal or near-optimal angles.

    “On the other hand, there is increasing evidence that classes of problems exhibit pronounced parameter concentration of the optimal or near optimal angles [19], [51], [1], [6], [61], [17], [48], [41]”

    From High-Round QAOA for MAX $k$-SAT on Trapped Ion NISQ Devices (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. S. Hadfield, Z. Wang, B. O'Gorman, E. G. Rieffel, D. Venturelli, and R. Biswas, "From the quantum approximate optimization algorithm to a quantum alternating operator ansatz," Algorithms, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 34, 2019.
  2. V. Akshay, D. Rabinovich, E. Campos, and J. Biamonte, "Param- eter concentration in quantum approximate optimization," arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.11976, 2021. · arXiv
  3. M. Newman, Networks. Oxford university press, 2018.

Authors
Galda, A., Liu, X., Lykov, D., Alexeev, Y., & Safro, I.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
171-180
OpenAlex
W3169470213
Cited by
72
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.97
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
quantum approximate optimization algorithm, random graphs, MaxCut, combinatorial optimization, variational quantum algorithms, light cone, random regular graphs, approximation ratio, quantum advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review