The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Visual Narrative Path from Switching to Resuming a Requirements Engineering Task
Open accessAbstract
Requirements Engineering (RE) is closely tied to other development activities and is at the heart and foundation of every software development process. This makes RE the most data and communication intensive activity compared to other development tasks. The highly demanding communication makes task switching and interruptions inevitable in RE activities. While task switching often allows us to perform tasks effectively, it imposes a cognitive load and can be detrimental to the primary task, particularly in complex tasks as the ones typical for RE activities. Visualization mechanisms enhanced with analytical methods and interaction techniques help software developers obtain a better cognitive understanding of the complexity of RE decisions, leading to timelier and higher quality decisions. In this paper, we propose to apply interactive visual analytics techniques for managing requirements decisions from various perspectives, including stakeholders communication, RE task switching, and interruptions. We propose a new layered visualization framework that supports the analytical reasoning process of task switching. This framework consists of both data analysis and visualization layers. The visual layers offer interactive knowledge visualization components for managing task interruption decisions at different stages of an interruption (i.e. before, during, and after). The analytical layers provide narrative knowledge about the consequences of task switching decisions and help requirements engineers to recall their reasoning process and decisions upon resuming a task. Moreover, we surveyed 53 software developers to test our visual prototype and to explore more required features for the visual and analytical layers of our framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The findings of this study are in line with our previous studies [1-4] on the disruptiveness of task switching and task interruptions.”
From Two Sides of the Same Coin (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work
Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris, J. (2005) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1054972.1055017 · Cited by 503
Resumption strategies for interrupted programming tasks
Parnin, C., & Rugaber, S. (2011) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-010-9104-9 · Cited by 103
Task Interruptions in Requirements Engineering: Reality Versus Perceptions!
Abad, Z. S. H., Ruhe, G., & Bauer, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2017.75 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1109/RE.2016.61 · DOI
- 10.1145/2531602.2531710 · DOI
- agrawal, 1994, Fast algorithms for mining association rules, Proc 20th Int Conf on Very large Data Bases, 1215, 487
- frias-martinez, 2002, A prediction model for user access sequences, Web Mining for Usage Patterns and User Profiles
- 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5 · DOI
- carpendale, 2003, Considering Visual Variables As A Basis for Information Visualisation
- 10.1109/VAST.2010.5653598 · DOI
- eger, 2007, Cueing retrospective verbal reports in usability testing through eye-movement replay, Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers HCI But Not As We Know It-Volume 1 ser BCS-HCI '07, 129
- 10.1145/1357054.1357247 · DOI
- 10.1109/RE.2015.7320428 · DOI
- 10.1145/2884781.2884875 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/RE.2016.31 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_35 · DOI
- 10.1109/SER-IP.2017..5 · DOI · Paper page
- salvucci, 2010, The Multitasking Mind
- ghazi, 2017, Choosing Requirements for Experimentation with User Interfaces of Requirements Modeling Tools, 25th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'17)
- abad, 2017, What Works Better? A Study of Classifying Requirements, 25th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'17)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abad, Z. S. H., Karras, O., Schneider, K., Barker, K., & Bauer, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018 · doi:10.1145/3210459.3210471 · Cited by 32
Self-citationTask Interruptions in Requirements Engineering: Reality Versus Perceptions!
Abad, Z. S. H., Ruhe, G., & Bauer, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re.2017.75 · Cited by 12
Self-citationAbad, Z. S. H., Noaeen, M., Zowghi, D., Far, B. H., & Barker, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018 · doi:10.1145/3210459.3214170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abad, Z. S. H., Shymka, A., Le, J., Hammad, N., & Ruhe, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-09
- Pages
- 442-447
- OpenAlex
- W2729703817
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- requirements engineering, task switching, task interruption, visual analytics, narrative thinking, cognitive load, stakeholder communication, interactive visualization, developer survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Visual Narrative Path from Switching to Resuming a Requirements Engineering Task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/re.2017.81
- The paper
- Abad, Z. S. H., Shymka, A., Le, J., Hammad, N., & Ruhe, G. (2017). A Visual Narrative Path from Switching to Resuming a Requirements Engineering Task. 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE). https://doi.org/10.1109/re.2017.81