Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 802

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fixed priority scheduling of periodic task sets with arbitrary deadlines

Lehoczky, J.P.·1990·[1990] Proceedings 11th Real-Time Systems Symposium

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of fixed priority scheduling of periodic tasks with arbitrary deadlines. A general criterion for the schedulability of such a task set is given. Worst case bounds are given which generalize the Liu and Layland bound. The results are shown to provide a basis for developing predictable distributed real-time systems. 1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/real.1990.128748

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 802

Metadata

Authors
Lehoczky, J. P.
Venue
[1990] Proceedings 11th Real-Time Systems Symposium
Publisher
IEEE
Published
1990
Pages
201-209
ISSN
1052-8725 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145132630
Cited by
802
References
8
FWCI
4.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fixed priority scheduling of periodic task sets with arbitrary deadlines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/real.1990.128748
The paper
Lehoczky, J. P. (1990). Fixed priority scheduling of periodic task sets with arbitrary deadlines. [1990] Proceedings 11th Real-Time Systems Symposium. https://doi.org/10.1109/real.1990.128748

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.