The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A network security monitor
Abstract
This study concentrates on the security-related issues in a single broadcast LAN (local area network) such as Ethernet. The authors formalize various possible network attacks. Their basic strategy is to develop profiles of usage of network resources and then compare current usage patterns with the historical profile to determine possible security violations. Thus, the work is similar to the host-based intrusion-detection systems. Different from such systems, however, is the use of a hierarchical model to refine the focus of the intrusion-detection mechanism. The authors also report on the development of an experimental LAN monitor currently under implementation. Several network attacks have been simulated, and results on how the monitor has been able to detect these attacks are analyzed. Initial results demonstrate that many network attacks are detectable with the authors' monitor, although it can be defeated.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Byzantine generals problem
Lamport, L., Shostak, R., & Pease, M. (1982) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/357172.357176 · Cited by 6,023
Cited by
Intrusion detection using sequences of system calls
Hofmeyr, S. A., Forrest, S., & Somayaji, A. (1998) · Journal of Computer Security · doi:10.3233/jcs-980109 · Cited by 1,313
McHugh, J. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/382912.382923 · Cited by 1,309
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
Liu, H., & Lang, B. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9204396 · Cited by 1,133
Mukherjee, B., Heberlein, L. T., & Levitt, K. N. (1994) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/65.283931 · Cited by 1,043
Self-citationProbabilistic Alert Correlation
Valdes, A., & Skinner, K. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45474-8_4 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Heberlein, L. T., Dias, G. V., Levitt, K. N., Mukherjee, B., Wood, J., & Wolber, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings. 1990 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 1990
- Pages
- 296-304
- OpenAlex
- W2117002131
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A network security monitor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/risp.1990.63859
- The paper
- Heberlein, L. T., Dias, G. V., Levitt, K. N., Mukherjee, B., Wood, J., & Wolber, D. (1990). A network security monitor. Proceedings. 1990 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. https://doi.org/10.1109/risp.1990.63859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
