The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Three-dimensional model matching from an unconstrained viewpoint
Abstract
It is demonstrated that the affine viewing transformation is a reasonable approximation to perspective. A group of image vertices and edges, called the vertex-pair, which fully determines the affine transformation between a three-dimensional model and a two-dimensional image is defined. A clustering approach, which produces a set of consistent assignments between vertex-pairs in the model and in the image is described. A number of experimental results on outdoor images are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Object Recognition in the Geometric Era: A Retrospective
Mundy, J. L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957959_1 · Cited by 100
Self-citationUncooperative Spacecraft Pose Estimation Using an Infrared Camera During Proximity Operations
Shi, J.-F., Ulrich, S., Ruel, S., & Anctil, M. (2015) · AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition · doi:10.2514/6.2015-4429 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, D., & Mundy, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 208-220
- ISSN
- 1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163535310
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional model matching from an unconstrained viewpoint. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/robot.1987.1088004
- The paper
- Thompson, D., & Mundy, J. (2005). Three-dimensional model matching from an unconstrained viewpoint. Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.1987.1088004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
